The ones who are delusional enough to think it might actually be required by law to redact them like that, or that it somehow protects the victims and "the case" itself. A lot of them probably also not care enough about the files, but do find it amazing that Trumpler is "owning the libs" by doing this.
10 Comments
nemith@programming.dev · 23 pts · 206d
Who is this 22%? I approve of hiding child abusers?
BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 206d
The "Nah, The Leopards Can Have My Face, It's Fine" party
urandom@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 205d
That’s just the number of polled pedophiles
x00z@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 205d
The ones who are delusional enough to think it might actually be required by law to redact them like that, or that it somehow protects the victims and "the case" itself. A lot of them probably also not care enough about the files, but do find it amazing that Trumpler is "owning the libs" by doing this.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 205d
Didn't know 22% of NYT readers were pedophiles. Learn something new every day.
northendtrooper@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 206d
I would love to see what the explanations are from the 22%. I assume they fall under some reasons like:
you_are_dust@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 206d
I'm not a math surgeon, but that doesn't make 100%. What is the rest? They shrugged?
OldChicoAle@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 205d
Probably declined to have a position on the topic
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 205d
That 22% is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and MAGA bots
artyom@piefed.social · 1 pts · 198d
Well that's fucking depressing, thanks.