Despite new curbs, Elon Musk’s Grok at times produces sexualized images - even when told subjects didn’t consent
https://www.reuters.com/business/despite-new-curbs-elon-musks-grok-times-produces-sexualized-images-even-when-2026-02-03/
196 points · 20 comments · view on lemmy.world
20 Comments
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 52 pts · 228d
Shit made by rapists doesn't respect consent. Color me surprised.
XLE@piefed.social · 23 pts · 228d
It's almost like privacy violations and mass data collection for AI are fundamental violations of consent too
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 228d
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 19 pts · 228d
So all the countries are right that block this sh*t spitting machine.
wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org · 4 pts · 228d
You don't have to self censor here. Go ahead and say shit.
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 2 pts · 227d
I like it this way.
wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org · 1 pts · 227d
Ok... You do you.
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 228d
It’s a machine. It doesn’t understand the concept of consent or anything else for that matter.
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 4 pts · 228d
It must observe even these rules that it doesn't understand. Like everybody.
ag10n@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 228d
It can’t, it’s software that needs a governing body to dictate the rules.
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 228d
The rules are in its code. It was not designed with ethics in mind, it was designed to steal IP, fool people into thinking it's AI, and be profitable for its creators. They wrote the rules, and they do not care about right or wrong unless it impacts their bottom line.
jacksilver@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 228d
The issue is more that there aren't rules. Given there are billions of parameters that define how these models work, there isn't really a way to ensure that it cant produce unwanted content.
bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 227d
Then they should be banned and made illegal. If one wants to run a LLM locally on their consumer machine then fine, they're paying the electric bill.
But these things should not be running remotely on the internet were it's doing nothing but destroying our planet and collective sanity.
ag10n@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 228d
That’s the point, there has to be a human in the loop that sets explicit guard rails
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 228d
No, the point is the humans are there, but they're the wrong kind of humans who make the wrong kind of guardrails.
ag10n@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 227d
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 1 pts · 228d
...and that is an excuse since when?
ag10n@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 228d
It’s not an excuse, it doesn’t think or reason.
Unless the software owner sets the governing guardrails it cannot act or present or redact in the way a human can.
bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 227d
Then the software owner needs to be put in prison.
XLE@piefed.social · 5 pts · 228d
Some news sources continue to claim Elon has disabled the generation of CSAM on his social site. But as long as the "guardrails" used by AI companies are as vague as AI instructions themselves, they can't be trusted in the best of times, let alone on Elon Musk's Twitter.