c/news · by dude@lemmings.world · 221dThe DOJ Redacted a Photo of the Mona Lisa in the Epstein Files https://www.404media.co/the-doj-redacted-a-photo-of-the-mona-lisa-in-the-epstein-files/96 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world
8 Comments
JakenVeina@midwest.social · 23 pts · 220d
It's cause they used some AI bullshit do the redactions, isn't it?
Of course, I'm still just guessing because the article that opens with "Now we know why" never actually explains why.
SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz · 27 pts · 220d
The article has been updated to say that the original picture has a victim's face photoshopped over the painting.
CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 220d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_stand-in
You can see that it's upright on a street somewhere.
SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz · 0 pts · 219d
That makes sense, but then if it was a modern photo I'd kind-of expect the background (or the whole thing) to be in colour?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 219d
So the DoJ claims.
Put a % number on how much you believe that statement.
Madison420@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 220d
No they explain it in the article, the redacted version has a victims have pasted over the paintings face.
JakenVeina@midwest.social · 1 pts · 220d
The article appears to have been changed, since I read it. For one, there's now a paywall that wasn't there before.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 22 pts · 221d
Fellas, I'm.pretty sure that painting is public domain by now. You don't have to worry about DaVinci suing you over copyright.