Feel like comparing a qualy lap from the last year of a regulation set and a testing lap of the first year of a regulation set and then complaining that it's not as fast through the corners or at the end of the lap is pretty stupid.
Otherwise I guess it's good a showing you the differences on the new cars, but again once they're racing I probably won't notice.
5 Comments
florge@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 206d
Feel like comparing a qualy lap from the last year of a regulation set and a testing lap of the first year of a regulation set and then complaining that it's not as fast through the corners or at the end of the lap is pretty stupid.
Otherwise I guess it's good a showing you the differences on the new cars, but again once they're racing I probably won't notice.
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 206d
It's a yelinster video.
Their entire thing is manipulating facts.
Rheinish@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 206d
The video popped up in my YouTube feed and seemed informative. Is the channel known to be disreputable?
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 206d
Well for one. This is comparing a quali lap with a test lap, that's kinda the majority of their vids. Pointless comparisons trying to make 2+2=5.
Two. They spent the better part of last year spreading the "Norris bottler" toxic spam.
calamitycastle@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 206d
No it's not. Although these recent vids are a bit odd as they're adjusting the telemetry and sound to try and explain what is happening.
Their historical videos don't do that, and I have found them interesting and informative.