Presumably at some point a human being was involved in the decision making process to try and use this image to convey... some kind of message to other human beings, and at least one human being in that process couldn't be bothered to give the AI slop more than the most cursory glance.
Unless of course one could design a fully-automated system of generating pseudo-scientific clickbait factoid garbage accompanied by AI-generated illustrations, entirely dedicated to producing as much vaguely plausible-seeming garbage as possible, 24 hours a day, just spewing out the opposite of useful knowledge at an unfathomable rate.
But what kind of monster would deploy that weapon on humanity?
They can. However, what we mean by regurgitate is that they are mixing all those images into a colourful vomit, and vomit-inducing mess that is obvious. Nothing original, nothing 'made', just pure regurgitated slop.
Yes, we can and we will. It doesn't do what you're saying it does. We have seen some of the images it generates and a prompt for it, they were off a lot.
Also, even if it did, that's not the point of art. Good art is a process, failing is as much a part of that process, as is compromising, working around things etc. What such a thing would do is remove all that and create something lacking beauty, a 'soul' to be poetic about it.
All such things would do if they could do it 'perfectly' is teach people to never learn how to do things themselves which is a shame, because it would be wonderful to see what they could create if they had learned to actually make art instead of relying on something 'perfect' though as we've established, it isn't.
Fuck you! My weird, ethereal mesh parents let me link to their copper all the time, and I turned out just fine. The problem is all these underparented kids nowadays with their undeveloped third eyes, unprepared for the wondrous horrors of existence.
26 Comments
Gyroplast@pawb.social · 91 pts · 212d
Love how the dude is picking food off of the kid's plate.
They really don't give a flying fuck anymore, do they.
Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club · 36 pts · 212d
They? You mean the A.I. that made this? You think they ever gave shits?
GraniteM@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 212d
Presumably at some point a human being was involved in the decision making process to try and use this image to convey... some kind of message to other human beings, and at least one human being in that process couldn't be bothered to give the AI slop more than the most cursory glance.
Unless of course one could design a fully-automated system of generating pseudo-scientific clickbait factoid garbage accompanied by AI-generated illustrations, entirely dedicated to producing as much vaguely plausible-seeming garbage as possible, 24 hours a day, just spewing out the opposite of useful knowledge at an unfathomable rate.
But what kind of monster would deploy that weapon on humanity?
Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 212d
GraniteM@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 212d
Aw, fuck.
village604@adultswim.fan · 6 pts · 211d
AI won't make anything without being prompted.
oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 0 pts · 211d
LLMs, MLs and similar don't make anything, they regurgitate all the stolen work somebody else made.
village604@adultswim.fan · 4 pts · 211d
No, that's not how they work. They're not spitting out the exact image they ingested.
oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 210d
They can. However, what we mean by regurgitate is that they are mixing all those images into a colourful vomit, and vomit-inducing mess that is obvious. Nothing original, nothing 'made', just pure regurgitated slop.
village604@adultswim.fan · 1 pts · 210d
Regardless of the ethical implications, you can't honestly say that what they do isn't a technological marvel.
You can ask for a picture of just about anything, and if you're specific enough you can get it to generate exactly what's in your head.
oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 209d
Yes, we can and we will. It doesn't do what you're saying it does. We have seen some of the images it generates and a prompt for it, they were off a lot.
Also, even if it did, that's not the point of art. Good art is a process, failing is as much a part of that process, as is compromising, working around things etc. What such a thing would do is remove all that and create something lacking beauty, a 'soul' to be poetic about it.
All such things would do if they could do it 'perfectly' is teach people to never learn how to do things themselves which is a shame, because it would be wonderful to see what they could create if they had learned to actually make art instead of relying on something 'perfect' though as we've established, it isn't.
LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 212d
I was about to comment the same. Maybe the reason the kid grows up with issues is that their food kept getting stolen
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 212d
And only have 3 fingers, or 4 tops
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 6 pts · 212d
franzbroetchen@feddit.org · 7 pts · 212d
The guy is literally trying to pick up the food with a knife, so...
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 212d
I am trying to figure out what sort of utensil the child is using. It looks like a knife sort of
Wilco@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 212d
I thought it was a psionic robot vampire flex or something.
voidsignal@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 212d
I'm a simple man. AI slop == downvote
Szewek@sopuli.xyz · 8 pts · 212d
Even an ironic AI slop?
voidsignal@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 211d
yep. slop is slop
thenextguy@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 212d
I have know.
ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com · 12 pts · 212d
Ixoid@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 212d
But why you is?
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 212d
Fuck you! My weird, ethereal mesh parents let me link to their copper all the time, and I turned out just fine. The problem is all these underparented kids nowadays with their undeveloped third eyes, unprepared for the wondrous horrors of existence.
Lembot_0006@programming.dev · 9 pts · 212d
Sell copper, buy drugs -- be happy. A happy childhood is a path to a healthy adulthood.
AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 212d
Am i reading this correctly, this is making fun of someone who used this ai image in their post or sonething right?
ameancow@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 212d
thethrilloftime69@feddit.online · 2 pts · 212d
Figures