Probably intended to be talked about by the press for free advertising.
Or, he just doesnt care about showing respect in a court room.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/meta-trial-mark-zuckerberg-ai-glasses/
Probably intended to be talked about by the press for free advertising.
Or, he just doesnt care about showing respect in a court room.
10 Comments
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 178d
Who wants to wear a Ring doorbell camera on your face?
1984@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 178d
I cant even believe people buy those Alexa listening devices into their homes... Why are they trusting big tech?
Rooskie91@discuss.online · 2 pts · 178d
You either die a start up or live long enough to see yourself become Google.
Blueliner@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 178d
moody@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 178d
There is a difference. When the judge is scolding someone, they're talking to them, not about them.
Blueliner@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 178d
hypnicjerk@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 178d
in theory, that would depend on the legal merits of the case moreso than his conduct in the courtroom - but in the american legal system, it's famously a bad idea to get on the bad side of a judge, especially one who's actively judging you.
it's not a bad fight to pick but it's a weird place to pick it
Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 178d
Alternative to CBS.
mcbang2000@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 178d
peak dork
1984@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 178d
Like children with money. Lots of money.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 178d
How often do these people wearing these forget they have them on and recording when they go to the bathroom? If they are livestreaming, are they giving an unintentional live porn show?
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 1 pts · 177d
Now that you mention it a lot states have two-party consent laws for recordings. Doesn't that make those things illegal on private or restricted property?