"Samsung didn’t offer a rationale for this decision, but poor sales probably isn’t it. While the phone retailed for a whopping $2,899, Samsung was selling every unit it could produce. The company’s website actually teased restocks until recently, and desperate buyers were paying above MSRP on the second-hand market."
18 Comments
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 179d
Oh... Samsung, the new Google
org@lemmy.org · 15 pts · 179d
Lmfao.
IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com · 13 pts · 179d
It's the only foldable that actually makes sense.
mrfriki@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 178d
It better makes sense because it cost like 3 high end phones :)
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 178d
3 times the screen 3 times the price.
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 178d
Only 1 times the RAM tho
cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 178d
How does it make sense? They call it a Tri Fold but it only folds twice, not three times.
It's a phone and a tablet in one but costs more than the two of them together, even if the tablets are an iPhone Pro and an iPad Pro.
Make it make sense.
mutilated_sphincter@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 178d
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/trifold
0x0@infosec.pub · -1 pts · 178d
Fitting nick lmao
Triumph@fedia.io · 8 pts · 178d
It folds into three sections. Trifold.
BigBrownBeaver@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 178d
Well the front fell off
Jhex@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 178d
Can they stop a sale if it was not selling?... maybe stop "offering" tehehehehehe
cRazi_man@europe.pub · 13 pts · 178d
Did you read the article?
"Samsung didn’t offer a rationale for this decision, but poor sales probably isn’t it. While the phone retailed for a whopping $2,899, Samsung was selling every unit it could produce. The company’s website actually teased restocks until recently, and desperate buyers were paying above MSRP on the second-hand market."
Jhex@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 178d
Of course I didn't! who do you think I am hehehe.
Having said that, this makes little sense.. was Samsung producing 100 a week?
Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 178d
Rule 1: never read the article
solrize@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 178d
I suspect they broke too often. First thought was low sales but article says otherwise.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 178d
articles lie.
thatradomguy@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 178d
Hahaha