Nope.

358 points · 7 comments · view on lemmy.world

7 Comments

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 160d (6 replies)

In 1987 I would be more confused by the concept of a phone costing money AT ALL, let alone asking why the fuck it costs $800.

Remember, in 1987, car phones were starting to become a thing, cell phones were either not yet invented, or just barely invented. Either way, only businessmen had them, and only because they needed them for work.

99% of people had only a landline. And you didn't buy it. It was provided by your telephone company.

So the idea of a phone costing $800 would be crazy talk.

kautau@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 159d (1 reply)

It was provided

Sure, but the cost of it was also baked into your monthly subscription, you were renting it. And if they gave it to you “for free” they were still making tons of profits on your monthly bill

Not saying it’s not worse, but the idea that was like “when corporations were nice” also definitely isn’t true

Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe · 3 pts · 159d

By 1987 you no longer had to rent the phone itself.

DmMacniel@feddit.org · 13 pts · 159d

Motorola DynaTAC from 1984 for 4k USD would like to say hello.

FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 160d (1 reply)

I mean, novelty landlines existed.

sik0fewl@piefed.ca · 3 pts · 160d

But you probably rented yours from the phone company.

Kenny2999@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 159d

There were celphones in '87 but not many. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobira_Cityman_900