The Linux Foundation apparently thinks you can look at a snippet real hard for a minute or so, and you'll magically figure out if it's stolen or plagiarized from somewhere. Otherwise, I don't understand how their policy would possibly work. It's not like they're linking some sort of plagiarism checker, and as far as I know, those aren't reliable anyway.
Does somebody understand how that's meant to work? I'm curious. If I'm judging them too harshly here, I would like to know.
6 Comments
ceiphas@feddit.org · 13 pts · 148d
Simple solution: don't use ai...
If you use the plagiarism machine, you're to blame for the results...
ell1e@leminal.space · 3 pts · 148d
Sadly, the Linux Foundation seems to think differently. I've actually tried to email them about it, but with no answer. I hoped that when more people see the mastodon or lemmy posts, more people might email them about it.
jaredwhite@humansare.social · 7 pts · 148d
Alas, the Linux Foundation is overrun by corporate shills who platform Big Tech greed and ignore harm. Ethically, they have little credibility. 😕
cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 148d
Its so insane considering Linux and FLOSS is supposed to take power away from big tech. Its just so hypocritical.
cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 148d
Just to clarify, is this Linux foundation in charge of the kernel? I'm not sure how the chain of command goes over there.
ell1e@leminal.space · 1 pts · 147d
The Linux Foundation organizes most of the kernel developer events, I believe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Foundation#Community_stewardship If any org has influence of the kernel developers at all, it's probably the Linux Foundation.