That's a very long-winded of saying you support the right for me to lose the money I deserve as the creator of a product. We have nothing left to talk about. Bye.
That's a ridiculous statement. I make royalties from sales of an audio sample library I once worked on. If people just pirated that sample library and got it for free and didn't buy it, I wouldn't receive any royalties.
Funny, I know plenty of artists who care very much about copyright. I am one of them.
None of these anti-copyright arguments hold any water for me. Copyright protects everyone, regardless of if they're tiny or huge. If you believe that isn't true because of the legal system favoring those with big pockets, that's the problem, not the concept of copyright per se.
"AI" is a computer program. There's nothing magical about it.
When you intentionally program a system to run in a loop autonomously without humans verifying every action taken, guess what? Shit happens. This was entirely predictable.
Either this is a poorly written article or it is totally LLM slop.
Developers bragged about scale and beauty, and the brag couldn't be faked; the artifact proved it. Skill was the visible half of a pair. Taste rode along with skill.
Have you seen the booking.com ads? They're literally about people in crappy desk jobs dreaming about going to some beautiful paradise location, and the location is AI generated. Think about it. People are dreaming about going to a fake place in the ad because the actual earth isn't exciting enough? WTF 😵💫
FYI this seems to be the AI tool mentioned in the article. Funny, I don't see anything on the homepage about the fact their tool can spew inaccurate nonsense. But they do present some gems like "The question is not what the plan costs. It is what the plan includes when the work gets heavy." 🤣
I'm curious why all of the example "insults" seem to be making fun of supposed left-wing attacks. No mention of "woke" "retard" "communist" "braindead" etc.
As a resident of Portland, Oregon, also known as Rose City, I can confirm that the only guitars played by any of the musicians who live here are Floyd Rose™ equipped guitars. It's a city ordinance actually.
If someone types into a prompt and they get a bunch of code spat out, I don't care if they reviewed it or not. It's slop.
The only LLM-assisted code I can think of which I personally would not classify as vibe coding is the old-school copilot autocomplete. Unfortunately, that's not what anyone really means nowadays—so-called agenetic coding has become the norm.
And it was slop coded by engineers who think it's fine to talk in abusive mannerisms to chatbots inside of GitHub PRs.
I'm staying far, far away from this nonsense. Personally I only write in JavaScript anyway and only use tsc for type checking. Will pin to v6 for as long as humanly possible.
That's a very long-winded of saying you support the right for me to lose the money I deserve as the creator of a product. We have nothing left to talk about. Bye.
That's a ridiculous statement. I make royalties from sales of an audio sample library I once worked on. If people just pirated that sample library and got it for free and didn't buy it, I wouldn't receive any royalties.
That's called theft.
Funny, I know plenty of artists who care very much about copyright. I am one of them.
None of these anti-copyright arguments hold any water for me. Copyright protects everyone, regardless of if they're tiny or huge. If you believe that isn't true because of the legal system favoring those with big pockets, that's the problem, not the concept of copyright per se.
Wow, you suck.
"AI" is a computer program. There's nothing magical about it.
When you intentionally program a system to run in a loop autonomously without humans verifying every action taken, guess what? Shit happens. This was entirely predictable.
Either this is a poorly written article or it is totally LLM slop.
huh?
AI;DR
What will the LLMs do when all the humans whose work they have stolen in order to function at all decide to leave the marketplace of ideas? 🤔
Have you seen the booking.com ads? They're literally about people in crappy desk jobs dreaming about going to some beautiful paradise location, and the location is AI generated. Think about it. People are dreaming about going to a fake place in the ad because the actual earth isn't exciting enough? WTF 😵💫
FYI this seems to be the AI tool mentioned in the article. Funny, I don't see anything on the homepage about the fact their tool can spew inaccurate nonsense. But they do present some gems like "The question is not what the plan costs. It is what the plan includes when the work gets heavy." 🤣
https://www.irys.ai/
I can really feel the sparks fly between us whenever we're together
I'm curious why all of the example "insults" seem to be making fun of supposed left-wing attacks. No mention of "woke" "retard" "communist" "braindead" etc.
Seems like a missed opportunity.
I just want a way search Web pages which exist on the Internet. You had one job Google! One job! 🤣
As a resident of Portland, Oregon, also known as Rose City, I can confirm that the only guitars played by any of the musicians who live here are Floyd Rose™ equipped guitars. It's a city ordinance actually.
My shorter answer: if you think you need to use canvas,
you don't.
(Unless you're literally building a drawing app.)
99.99% of web applications would be better off virtually ignoring "best practices" introduced by Big Tech.
If someone types into a prompt and they get a bunch of code spat out, I don't care if they reviewed it or not. It's slop.
The only LLM-assisted code I can think of which I personally would not classify as vibe coding is the old-school copilot autocomplete. Unfortunately, that's not what anyone really means nowadays—so-called agenetic coding has become the norm.
Also, regarding your last assertion, see: https://handcraftedcode.org/
Just go look at the repo. 😅
Well that's just demonstrably wrong. Go look at the commit history of the go port. Extensive use of Copilot. Slop.
And it was slop coded by engineers who think it's fine to talk in abusive mannerisms to chatbots inside of GitHub PRs.
I'm staying far, far away from this nonsense. Personally I only write in JavaScript anyway and only use tsc for type checking. Will pin to v6 for as long as humanly possible.
DOA.