I though people liked having all the scientific data available to them when making permanent life altering decisions. Do u not believe in science? Or only when the facts are convenient?
Wow defending Charlie kirk makes u a Nazi huh? It seems my definition is very fitting lol. If u had read a single fucking book written by high ranking Nazis u would see the clear socialism.
So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let's apply your logic:
You think the people Charlie spoke to where Nazis.
Because he spoke to them he is therefore a Nazi.
I'm defending Charlie kirk which by your claims makes me a Nazi.
Your having a conversations with me would thus make you a Nazi (by the same logic u used to define Charlie as a Nazi).
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it's a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I'm glad you're finally admitting you are pro nazi
Is socialism the only part you look at? Whether they used capitalism or socialism or any other fiscal ism has very little to do with the fact that it was authoritarian and fascist. Kirk was a horrific figure for anyone to support because he supported the same kinds of authoritarian and fascist doctrine that dominated the Nazi regime. This is to say nothing of his promulgating hateful rhetoric regarding anyone that wasn't a straight white christian male.
It seems some mod got buthurt over some words and decided to ban me from everywhere they could then remove a factual and well thought out argument that had raised no prior concerns. The bias this shows is to some degree fascist behaviour but the irony of that will go right over ur head.
I've always wondered where the line was, or how blurry it is, between "haha, look at us, we're the PC masterrace and those are the console peasants" and actual chauvinism...
One is an obvious joke, the other isnât. Anyone who takes PCMR to the level of racism or chauvinism is a problem, and usually one the rest of the âgroupâ will call out.
And to be clear, Iâm using âgroupâ very loosely here, because itâs not like there are any sort of hard line on who is part of PCMR, just wanting a PC and not being able to afford one is âgood enoughâ. Anyone gatekeeping is also a problem.
30 Comments
abbadon420@sh.itjust.works · 32 pts · 147d
Exposing nazis is a great passtime for the whole family.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -28 pts · 147d
Define Nazi cos I've found most peoples definition tends to be "anyone who isn't as left wing as I am".
OrganicMustard@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 147d
I checked your comments and you are one.
This user believes in white replacement and other Nazi stuff if you want to block them.
Keshara@piefed.world · 17 pts · 147d
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -8 pts · 147d
I though people liked having all the scientific data available to them when making permanent life altering decisions. Do u not believe in science? Or only when the facts are convenient?
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org · 15 pts · 147d
Modlog also full of them being one.
https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=13162145
Including defending Charlie Kirk and saying nazis are actually socialists because they put it in the name đ
SystemQ@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 147d
Lmao this particular sequence of events is pretty funny
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · 0 pts · 145d
I was proud of that one. Even went a made a meme and all.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -9 pts · 147d
Wow defending Charlie kirk makes u a Nazi huh? It seems my definition is very fitting lol. If u had read a single fucking book written by high ranking Nazis u would see the clear socialism.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org · 8 pts · 147d
Yes he was one and defending him is defending a nazi.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/02/charlie-kirk-whiteness-turning-points-usa/
Please enlighten us
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -1 pts · 145d
So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let's apply your logic:
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 145d
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it's a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I'm glad you're finally admitting you are pro nazi
JigglySackles@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 147d
Is socialism the only part you look at? Whether they used capitalism or socialism or any other fiscal ism has very little to do with the fact that it was authoritarian and fascist. Kirk was a horrific figure for anyone to support because he supported the same kinds of authoritarian and fascist doctrine that dominated the Nazi regime. This is to say nothing of his promulgating hateful rhetoric regarding anyone that wasn't a straight white christian male.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -2 pts · 145d
My argument was that the national socialist where in fact socialist. I was not and am not defending the rest of their ideology.
Please link me the clips of Charlie supporting fascist Nazi doctrine. Since your so confident this should be very easy.
That's a load of bullshit: Clip 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OOp4zBkJ14 Clip 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJmcqjP8mhk
JigglySackles@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 145d
If you cared about evidence we wouldn't be talking and you wouldn't be defending him.
Here's a link you'll ignore and hand wave.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs
tpyo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 146d
At some point between viewing this thread and responding it got removed. But just a few posts up I saw this:
https://lemmy.world/post/45032005
It's exactly this. Good callout
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -12 pts · 147d
When did I say anything about white replacement? What Nazi things do I believe cos I sure as shit don't recall supporting them.
ignotum@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 147d
In your comment that was removed just 45 minutes ago you fucking dipshit
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -8 pts · 147d
It seems some mod got buthurt over some words and decided to ban me from everywhere they could then remove a factual and well thought out argument that had raised no prior concerns. The bias this shows is to some degree fascist behaviour but the irony of that will go right over ur head.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 147d
And the winner of the goalpost moving competition is...
verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 6 pts · 147d
tpyo@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 146d
I had to scroll up a few posts. But it encapsulates this exact exchange. Well done.
https://lemmy.world/post/45032005
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -3 pts · 145d
That's not a definition that's an ideological lecture trying to mascaraed as a comic.
Their is also a direct correlation between the number of words in a meme or comic and the shitness of said meme or comic.
LiveLM@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 147d
Racism. In the Computer Monitor discussion group. Why are people the way they are? đ
kyub@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 147d
I've always wondered where the line was, or how blurry it is, between "haha, look at us, we're the PC masterrace and those are the console peasants" and actual chauvinism...
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 147d
One is an obvious joke, the other isnât. Anyone who takes PCMR to the level of racism or chauvinism is a problem, and usually one the rest of the âgroupâ will call out.
And to be clear, Iâm using âgroupâ very loosely here, because itâs not like there are any sort of hard line on who is part of PCMR, just wanting a PC and not being able to afford one is âgood enoughâ. Anyone gatekeeping is also a problem.
lechekaflan@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 141d