I know back in the old country (blueit er redhat or whatever it was) there was a rule for waiting a year or some time before reposts were allowed again. Should there be something like that here?
On an unrelated note, I got my friend the other day with a zinger. They were recovering from surgery and said they were moving up their diet and the nurse was getting them a liquid menu. I said, “LIQUID MENU? HOW ARE YOU GONNA HOLD IT?” …I think I could hear eyes rolled over the phone.
5 Comments
fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk · 8 pts · 2y
I'm sure that not everyone will agree, but it's a little bit sparse for content at the moment, so I'd be inclined to "just churn it out for a while", reposts and all, and maybe make that rule in six months.
As this is a Dad jokes post, I was going to tell a bad joke about chemistry, but I didn’t think it would get a reaction.
lando55@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
I disagree, this could be the catalyst we need for change
Syrc@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y
Would be appreciated. Obviously without punishment, just remove the post (unless it’s a very frequent offender)
lando55@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
What do you guys think about a rule for reposts?
Melody@lemmy.one · 6 pts · 2y
3-6 months and remove; no warning/action unless very frequent or persistent.
Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y