Being honest I’m not convinced that Rap is a good choice for this series, but hopefully Kevin knows what he’s doing (and in any case, I’m happy for Calli landing another role in a series she likes)
I did find a lot of news articles saying that (for example) iPhones are excluded, though none of them had a clear source. Maybe mine is outdated too, I guess we’ll just have to see when they announce the new models.
I wonder though, do they switch them around based on current necessities? Are they “three-timing” and everyone is told that they’re the fifth member, unaware of the existence of the others? I guess we’ll never know.
(a) appliances, including wearable devices, specifically designed to operate primarily
in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water
immersion, and that are intended to be washable or rinseable
So I don’t think it applies to mobile phones. Or did it get changed again?
Especially since there’s a billion better ways to address this. Like, it’s literal cardboard, just print more.
Maybe I’m getting into tinfoil hat territory, but I feel like they intentionally want to capitalize on scalpers and are afraid that without scarcity they’d end up selling less.
On one hand, I’m very curious and will definitely download it, but on the other I know I’ll have to uninstall it after a bit because knowing myself it’s gonna eat up too much of my free time otherwise lol
I love stats and I love achievements, needless to say I love this site lol
A graphic issue I’ve noticed is that no matter which year I click, the bottom of the page says “View your pixels placed in 2025” (though the links actually lead to the ones from the correct year)
(Also, the link at the bottom of this post doesn’t work correctly, but the one at the top does)
Not sure if I just missed it/am misremembering, but I feel like last year/s there was an option to upload your own template directly instead of just URL, was it always like this?
(In any case, thanks for the event as usual! And loved the new UI and color picker!)
I think it’s a plural “you” referring to the Republican Party in general, and it’s talking about the “Big Beautiful Bill” last year which had cuts to the SNAP.
And don’t tell me it’s because you copy pasted the title of the source article or something.
Well yeah, it’s usually good practice not to change the source article’s title.
Do I think the “black communities” part was necessary in the title? Not really. But if the author decided to frame it like that, and OP wanted to repost it as-is, I see no issue with that.
Is this about the Gog Newsletter thing? I’m not 100% informed, but didn’t they pretty much admit that they weren’t aware that ᛋ displayed as ϟ in some devices?
It’s not even a “sorry we got caught” thing, they had nothing to gain by sending a Nazi symbol in their newsletter. What more are they supposed to say?
Just have glasses with clear visual (possibly even auditory) indicators that they’re recording, and store the footage in an SD card, easy. Of course though, they won’t sell nearly as much because people won’t be able to use them to showcase le epic pickup skillz.
They are not used for good. Pretty sure it’s been proven a lot of individuals that have access to the footage disproportionately search through the database, likely not for law enforcement reasons.
Eh, even the guy in the video mentions the distribution being a factor in the hype dying down. I think with a bigger distribution they could’ve worked better, the main issue with the Meta ones is that they’re basically made to record stuff inconspicuously and that’s freaking creepy.
Oh no no, they clearly want to protect children, don’t you see how hard they’re working to persecute the evil LGBT pedophiles?
On a serious note, yes there’s probably a disgusting amount of pedophiles in that party, but they’ve never campaigned on that because they know they have to keep up the facade of “the family party” and whatnot. None of them is probably even interested in legalizing it when they can just… do it and no one will prosecute them anyway.
Though yeah, I should’ve specified “legalizing sex with children party”, if it’s “just” doing it unfortunately we do have enough people that voted it (and it’s still a symptom of a bigger issue in either case).
Being honest I’m not convinced that Rap is a good choice for this series, but hopefully Kevin knows what he’s doing (and in any case, I’m happy for Calli landing another role in a series she likes)
I did find a lot of news articles saying that (for example) iPhones are excluded, though none of them had a clear source. Maybe mine is outdated too, I guess we’ll just have to see when they announce the new models.
I wonder though, do they switch them around based on current necessities? Are they “three-timing” and everyone is told that they’re the fifth member, unaware of the existence of the others? I guess we’ll never know.
The Delegated Act I found says the exception is for
So I don’t think it applies to mobile phones. Or did it get changed again?
*Looks at Kronii and Watame* if I had a penny for every fifth member of Justice I’ve seen…
Especially since there’s a billion better ways to address this. Like, it’s literal cardboard, just print more.
Maybe I’m getting into tinfoil hat territory, but I feel like they intentionally want to capitalize on scalpers and are afraid that without scarcity they’d end up selling less.
On one hand, I’m very curious and will definitely download it, but on the other I know I’ll have to uninstall it after a bit because knowing myself it’s gonna eat up too much of my free time otherwise lol
I love stats and I love achievements, needless to say I love this site lol
A graphic issue I’ve noticed is that no matter which year I click, the bottom of the page says “View your pixels placed in 2025” (though the links actually lead to the ones from the correct year)
(Also, the link at the bottom of this post doesn’t work correctly, but the one at the top does)
Not sure if I just missed it/am misremembering, but I feel like last year/s there was an option to upload your own template directly instead of just URL, was it always like this?
(In any case, thanks for the event as usual! And loved the new UI and color picker!)
I think it’s a plural “you” referring to the Republican Party in general, and it’s talking about the “Big Beautiful Bill” last year which had cuts to the SNAP.
Well yeah, it’s usually good practice not to change the source article’s title.
Do I think the “black communities” part was necessary in the title? Not really. But if the author decided to frame it like that, and OP wanted to repost it as-is, I see no issue with that.
Is this about the Gog Newsletter thing? I’m not 100% informed, but didn’t they pretty much admit that they weren’t aware that ᛋ displayed as ϟ in some devices?
It’s not even a “sorry we got caught” thing, they had nothing to gain by sending a Nazi symbol in their newsletter. What more are they supposed to say?
Just have glasses with clear visual (possibly even auditory) indicators that they’re recording, and store the footage in an SD card, easy. Of course though, they won’t sell nearly as much because people won’t be able to use them to showcase le epic pickup skillz.
They are not used for good. Pretty sure it’s been proven a lot of individuals that have access to the footage disproportionately search through the database, likely not for law enforcement reasons.
Did you mean “despise”? …though in hindsight, “dispose” would probably be better
Erm, ackshually, Rule 34 is “if it exists, there is porn of it”.
Which means somewhere, there’s pics OF sexy anthropomorphic meta glasses. Maybe not even anthropomorphic.
Eh, even the guy in the video mentions the distribution being a factor in the hype dying down. I think with a bigger distribution they could’ve worked better, the main issue with the Meta ones is that they’re basically made to record stuff inconspicuously and that’s freaking creepy.
Now, will it take that long for Rotoms too? 4 out of 6 are still paywalled…
June is Pride Month so the photos aren’t “straight”
Oh no no, they clearly want to protect children, don’t you see how hard they’re working to persecute the evil LGBT pedophiles?
On a serious note, yes there’s probably a disgusting amount of pedophiles in that party, but they’ve never campaigned on that because they know they have to keep up the facade of “the family party” and whatnot. None of them is probably even interested in legalizing it when they can just… do it and no one will prosecute them anyway.
Though yeah, I should’ve specified “legalizing sex with children party”, if it’s “just” doing it unfortunately we do have enough people that voted it (and it’s still a symptom of a bigger issue in either case).