The values on the graph do not represent absolute search volume. Instead they are normalized, then indexed on a scale from 1-100. Each point on the graph is divided by the highest point, 100.See how the maximum points change again when we click + Add comparison and type in another topic, such as ketogenic diet.
Thank you for finding that and providing a source!
So there will always be 100 and always 0 and that can be 100 searches in that time period or 1 billion. It's not very useful unless you've seen absolute numbers, IMO.
Which Google will never provide. Partially because it can give insight into their search algorithm, and partially because absolute values are not necessarily comparable when their algorithm changes over time.
17 Comments
catdog@lemmy.ml · 53 pts · 141d
Literally the year of Linux for desktop.
Velypso@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 141d
1
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 140d
That's ok, a Windows update will break the drivers anyway
Velypso@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 140d
1
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 140d
I dunno, like constantly?
Here's the top result on Google https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/nvidia-points-finger-at-windows-update-microsoft-patch-blamed-for-pc-gaming-issues
Velypso@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 140d
1
mbp@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 140d
You do have a point.
nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 140d
Blender renders on my Nvidia GPU are 5-20% faster on Linux, compared to Windows.
5-20% range because it depends on the scene. But it is always faster.
kbal@fedia.io · 29 pts · 141d
Linux vs Windows? One is a popular computer operating system, the other is some kind of advertising and data collection tool from Microsoft.
HuePony@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 140d
Microslop*
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 140d
Slopya Nutella
onlinepersona@programming.dev · 15 pts · 141d
What's the y axis? No idea what "interest" means
Whimsical418@aussie.zone · 33 pts · 141d
Probably correlated to search volume on Google, with 100% being the max on the chart 🤷
governorkeagan_@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 141d
Pretty much this.
Source
onlinepersona@programming.dev · 9 pts · 141d
Thank you for finding that and providing a source!
So there will always be 100 and always 0 and that can be 100 searches in that time period or 1 billion. It's not very useful unless you've seen absolute numbers, IMO.
frongt@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 141d
Which Google will never provide. Partially because it can give insight into their search algorithm, and partially because absolute values are not necessarily comparable when their algorithm changes over time.
onlinepersona@programming.dev · 2 pts · 141d
What does it have to do with algorithms? It's search terms. Unless the search terms are aggregated and guessed, algorithms shouldn't matter.