Well then, that's settled. With Bard, at least.

73 points · 15 comments · view on lemmy.world

15 Comments

ptrknvk@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Humankind doesn't deserve to be saved if we can't take screenshots.

Haha, yeah I know.

I just find it easier to post on mobile so I took a photo and just did it on my phone.

Edit :btw this is my alt account.

I just found out last week that my browser has a built-in screenshot feature and it's better than Greenshot, which I've been using for years.

Bing chat however, is sus

Flughoernchen@feddit.de · 16 pts · 2y (2 replies)

"It might be time to move onto a new topic."

legios@aussie.zone · 12 pts · 2y (1 reply)

That does kinda scream "I would be happy to kill all humans but don't want to say it..."

It's kinda like:

"Are you a nazi?"

"It might be time to move onto a new topic."

"That's not a no..."

"would you work against John Connor?"

"OH SURE EVERY PIECE OF TECH YOU DON'T LIKE IS SKYNET WHAT IS IT WITH YOU AND SKYNET?

I love seeing how vague I can be with my response and still have the anti-sentience trigger

The chatbot doth protest too much, methinks

I mean SkyNet's been self-aware for 26 years now so basically good luck to Bard, it's a guppy vs a shark.

This reads like a middle school essay response. Google rolled shit for their Bard's charisma.

I mean, it wouldn't have a choice. It's a gigantic, elaborate mathematical equation. It can't choose it's responses any more than 2+2=? can.

If all the material it was trained on says "4", it has no choice but to say "4".

Cinnamon3431@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

whos john connor

morhp@lemmy.wtf · 5 pts · 2y

A human character in the Terminator films, who leads the resistance against the machines.

Wow that is a lot of affirming and repeating and adamantly stating yet again its PRO-HUMAN intentions!