More than 70 organizations, including the ACLU, EPIC, and Fight for the Future, say the AI smart glasses feature would endanger abuse victims, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ people.
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260413160924/https://www.wired.com/story/meta-ray-ban-oakley-smart-glasses-no-face-recognition-civil-society/
35 Comments
mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de · 71 pts · 129d
Meta:
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 129d
Creeps will instantly use it to go to where women are and find their accounts.
Not to mention any woman that has to work a customer facing job.
This would suck for men too tho, it would suck for everyone.
But it might be what it finally takes to get the dumb masses off Meta platforms. There's so many other reasons anyways, but idiots just can't delete their Instas
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 129d
Fuckers played WatchDogs and thought what a great idea.
favoredponcho@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 129d
LordCrom@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d
I already do
jaycifer@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 128d
In the first case the device would still have to identify people not connected to the wearer to determine if they are connected or not. That seems like it would make it much easier to bypass and tag strangers anyway.
underscores@lemmy.zip · 36 pts · 129d
quite literally the worst and most sociopathic invention possible
Drusas@fedia.io · 26 pts · 129d
This sort of item should be illegal.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 129d
I saw some fucking idiot with these on at a show a few months ago and I had to exert a lot of control not to yank them off her face and stomp on them.
Nobody wants to be recorded secretly. Especially not at a show. That’s a gross invasion of privacy - and, in fact, illegal in some jurisdictions (two-party consent laws for recordings).
moonshadow@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 128d
Less control next time please, dunno how old you are but that's exactly the human immune response that rid us of Google Glass. Early beta testers consistently got rocked whenever they wore them outside and the project went nowhere. I'm too old now and don't get out enough but pray the kids are up to rejecting round 2
Drusas@fedia.io · 1 pts · 128d
I'm already that dick who calls everyone out if they're recording or taking pictures on their phone during the show, so I am definitely comfortable calling out these jerks.
DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf · 22 pts · 129d
That's Meta's whole intention with these.
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · 5 pts · 129d
Meta will arm them... but they won't have legs
artyom@piefed.social · 1 pts · 129d
...in pursuit of what?
moonshadow@slrpnk.net · 0 pts · 128d
Data?
blueberry_tart@piefed.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 129d
Wouldn't be surprised if there are some Palantir x Meta smart glasses in the pipeline.
pivot_root@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 129d
Pre-order now and get one free year of Flock Together—the only personal security service that combines cutting-edge facial recognition technology with Persona integration to provide real-time risk assessments of your fellow countrymen based on their
socialcredit score, public records, and data broker profile.DarthPub@retrofed.com · 13 pts · 129d
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 128d
making a mechanical scream similar to the body snatchers people in tha tmovie.
Maeve@kbin.earth · 11 pts · 129d
fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d
nothingcorporate@lemmy.today · 9 pts · 129d
ozymandias@sh.itjust.works · -8 pts · 129d
wait til they find out about cellphone cameras and the 1,000 other video glasses companies
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 129d
The main issue isn’t even the technology itself, it’s that it’s Meta and owned by the Zuck.
I’m sure there are ways to engineer this so the data stays on device and use it for specific scientific purposes exclusively.
Dionysus@leminal.space · 5 pts · 129d
There is absolutely.
You'll never appease the shareholders or maintain your
quarterlygrowth that way... ^Trump is pushing to eliminate quarterly reports for public companies, so they may not need to care and can just be evil for the sake of it.^It's funny how they enshittify it for consumers first, but now aiming spread enshitification to wall street so they can fuck those 401ks even harder.
Capitalism baby!
artyom@piefed.social · 3 pts · 129d
There are a thousand corporations tripping over themselves to out-horrify the public.
I'm sure there are but if you see one in public, how would you know? Best just to ban them all.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 128d
zuck is meta.
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 129d
If I ever see anyone with them and they look in my direction they will be turned into monicals.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 129d
Sounds like you need to talk to your local government officials about having them banned in your area, otherwise you are going to spend a lot of time in jail/prison. Glasses didn't take off when Google did them because the tech wasn't there yet 10 years ago. Meta is launching theirs now, Apple will be launching multiple next year, which means Google may be launching them again depending on the success Apple and Meta see.
As far as laws go in the U.S. It is generally accepted that if you leave your property, you can be recorded. Hence Ring doorbells, cameras in and outside every store, on the street lights, etc. I don't care for it, but privacy (in public) doesn't exist anymore.
artyom@piefed.social · 1 pts · 129d
That's not true. They didn't take off because they boiled the frog too fast. They were rejected by polite society. That society is gone.
UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe · 3 pts · 129d
Palatable effort, fellow keyboard warrior!
skhayfa@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 129d
I really wanted to read harm not arm.
etherphon@piefed.world · 2 pts · 128d
Vieric@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 128d
Hell, they probably consider that a plus.
bpinyon@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 129d
What? They didn’t learn this the first time? Yes the glasses are a cool idea but we need to be more responsible.
Soapbox@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 128d
I don't even get why anyone thinks they are cool. They don't even have displays in them. I would understand for smart glasses with no cameras, but the ability to display a HUD with navigation, music info, text messages, etc.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 128d
just like the og google glasses it ended used for PORN.
derAbsender@piefed.social · 0 pts · 128d
That's capitalism: they have to please their shareholders.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 128d
If it makes money then nothing else counts. Go american capitalism! /s