Wikipedia has banned use of Al to write articles on their site

Read an article on this, days ago! Atleast it isn't corrupted with AI anymore! Maybe im too late to note this, but happy anyways!

339 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world

17 Comments

0li0li@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 132d (3 replies)

Most of it is outdated, what?

Allstrive@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 132d (2 replies)

To southern parts of india, most details are outdated! political articles, demographics, and details about our actors! shoudl've mentioned (regionally) my mistake! thanks for stressing it

iamthetot@piefed.ca · 6 pts · 132d (1 reply)

You could contribute to correct those.

Allstrive@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 132d

knew it, not a new insight!

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 132d (1 reply)

Gonna need an explanation for "outdated"

Allstrive@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 132d

To southern parts of india, most details are outdated! political articles, demographics, and details about our actors! shoudl've mentioned (regionally) my mistake!

Cytobit@piefed.social · 14 pts · 132d (4 replies)

Low effort post. At least link to an news article, if not the amended rules.

Anyway, this is old news. Here's an article from March https://www.pcworld.com/article/3099863/wikipedia-just-banned-ai-written-articles.html

Allstrive@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 132d (3 replies)

You’re treating a quick post like it was meant to be a full brief. It wasn’t. If the standard is “no post unless it’s exhaustive,” most discussions wouldn’t exist. This was just a starting point. Think before commenting, anyways appreciate you adding context though.

quick_snail@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 131d (2 replies)

If you're going to do a "quick post" then don't make any post at all.

We have rules here. Take the time and keep quality high.

Allstrive@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 131d (1 reply)

says someone with 0 posts! uhmm! interesting, thanks!

quick_snail@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 131d

I use other accounts for posting, for privacy

iamthetot@piefed.ca · 9 pts · 132d (1 reply)

How is it outdated?

Allstrive@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 132d

check the first 2 replies, you'll understand

desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 132d (3 replies)

No need to be evaluated by your children. Facts don't matter there.

Allstrive@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 132d (2 replies)

Comparing peer-reviewed citations to parental feelings is exactly why we need editors in the first place.

desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 132d (1 reply)

Bring back local printed news.

Allstrive@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 132d

best response!