Source: https://bsky.app/profile/magic.wizards.com/post/3mkvqoghxru24
Based on the similarities that Dan Frazier's The One Ring has to the borderless art by Marta Nael


IMO, this seems like letting Dan off way too easy. It's a pretty blatant copy of the art by Marta and a disappointing thing to see such a well-respected Magic artist do. Perhaps they're just not pressing the issue because of his age. But really how did the art directors not catch this before it got to print???

3 Comments
nocturne@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 108d
From reading comments it sounds like wotc admitted they used the wrong version. There also was a back and forth between Dan's agent and wotc over his original submission. Dan, a classically trained artist, normally submits oil paintings. The art for this set was required to be all digital.
I very well could see Dan having submitted the work he wanted, wotc saying no, they send him Marta's work as reference, he flips it, smudges it, tosses it on a stock background, and resubmits it as a 🖕to wotc, they shrug and print it.
thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 109d
Lawyers, threats, press releases and so on.
“We’re all human, let’s just be friends.”
mike@mtgzone.com · 2 pts · 107d
This whole thing is just so bizarre to me. I posted Jesper Myfors' latest response and I think I'm just as dumbfounded as to how this even happened. These are all the very weird things:
I just don't get any of it, it's so weird and so poorly done and so oddly handled.