They don't want literate people. The majority of American adults read below a sixth grade level, and about a quarter are functionally illiterate - source
(Though my personal favorite statistic from that page is that 2/3 of illiterate Americans were born in the US, who often the same people who complain endlessly about immigrants speaking multiple languages)
So the mega corps that need AI to be integrated into every facet of our society are now going to force feed AI down your children's throats. Isn't this country the best?
With all this discourse about AI one thing just keeps being the best indicator for something being wrong: If it were so great and pefect, it wouldnt need to be forced into everything. People would just integrate it themselves.
The course would be sure to tell all kids that AI is not intelligent, should never be trusted, and teach kids how to fact check everything that it says.
The end result should be that kids learn that it takes more work to get facts when using AI.
How about including an AI disinformation in this literacy class? Or using AI as a search engine to do fact checking. But I think they really mean "use AI for everything in schools and feed the data back to us" classes.
I mean as a search engine it is more efficient than google as it stands. And it can give references. Like everything though it can be forced to be biased and enshittified so hard to predict if it will stay that way.
The education needs to happen, but not for the reasons they are doing it - kids need to know how ai works so they know why it doesn't in many cases. Disspelling the magic answer machine idea from everyone's minds starts with learning how it works and how it doesn't.
Thats the one thing that is a necessary out of all of this. Its already out there, so learning the fundamentals and its limitations is the best case. It should be highly applicable to the concepts of LLMs which are broader and can be used for good purposes.
Of course, the techy kids and even teenagers may dabble in AI in their free time, with a bit more thought put in. Even if gen alpha isnt the most fond with AI.
27 Comments
outandinburger@ttrpg.network · 62 pts · 128d
Witchfire@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 128d
They don't want literate people. The majority of American adults read below a sixth grade level, and about a quarter are functionally illiterate - source
(Though my personal favorite statistic from that page is that 2/3 of illiterate Americans were born in the US, who often the same people who complain endlessly about immigrants speaking multiple languages)
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 4 pts · 127d
Is that stat just English literacy?
If someone can read Spanish but not English, are they deemed illiterate?
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 127d
How do I test my own reading level?
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 128d
AI literacy as in using AI to answer all your questions, aka brainrot.
reddig33@lemmy.world · 48 pts · 128d
Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 128d
So the mega corps that need AI to be integrated into every facet of our society are now going to force feed AI down your children's throats. Isn't this country the best?
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 28 pts · 128d
With all this discourse about AI one thing just keeps being the best indicator for something being wrong: If it were so great and pefect, it wouldnt need to be forced into everything. People would just integrate it themselves.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 128d
Meaning know less, understand less, depend on our product so you will become a good mindless drone that we can control?
Seriously, what the fuck is there to know about AI for the average joe? Nothing, that is the entire point.
This literally is about creating dependency and I would not allow my kids to have to follow such a shit education
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 127d
I mean, it could be like information literacy
The course would be sure to tell all kids that AI is not intelligent, should never be trusted, and teach kids how to fact check everything that it says.
The end result should be that kids learn that it takes more work to get facts when using AI.
mrmaplebar@fedia.io · 18 pts · 128d
"literacy" -> marketing
pipi1234@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 128d
This is akin to promoting the use of a product as mandatory in the school system. Oh yes, line cow milk.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 13 pts · 128d
How about including an AI disinformation in this literacy class? Or using AI as a search engine to do fact checking. But I think they really mean "use AI for everything in schools and feed the data back to us" classes.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 128d
they already have data how AI hurts students ability to read and write proficiently.
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 6 pts · 127d
You mean not using AI for fact checking?!?
Like, teaching them how to fact check everything AI says, because it's rubbish?
Avicenna@programming.dev · -2 pts · 127d
I mean as a search engine it is more efficient than google as it stands. And it can give references. Like everything though it can be forced to be biased and enshittified so hard to predict if it will stay that way.
thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 127d
It's not forced to be bias they have that inherently built in.
And they will make up refrences all the time, or even "understand" wrong.
LLMs have their use cases along side search engines but they aren't replacement for them
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 10 pts · 127d
They want to make future generations unable to think for themselves, and to be dependent on their tech their whole lives
Malyca@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 128d
Yet gun education is still not a thing
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 128d
Regular education is barely a thing.
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 127d
I'm usually opposed to teaching abstinence, but I'd much rather teach abstinence to gun use than teach kids how to load and store a firearm safely.
Blaster_M@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 128d
The education needs to happen, but not for the reasons they are doing it - kids need to know how ai works so they know why it doesn't in many cases. Disspelling the magic answer machine idea from everyone's minds starts with learning how it works and how it doesn't.
quick_snail@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 127d
We don't need a new course for this. It just needs to be appended to existing information literacy courses
Virtvirt588@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 128d
Thats the one thing that is a necessary out of all of this. Its already out there, so learning the fundamentals and its limitations is the best case. It should be highly applicable to the concepts of LLMs which are broader and can be used for good purposes.
Of course, the techy kids and even teenagers may dabble in AI in their free time, with a bit more thought put in. Even if gen alpha isnt the most fond with AI.
honesthenery@thelemmy.club · 7 pts · 128d
gross
green_red_black@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 128d
illi@piefed.social · 3 pts · 128d
With Google and Microslop pushing for this, I imagine the important parts beyond "this is how you prompt" will somehow get left out.
green_red_black@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 128d
LLMhater1312@piefed.social · 6 pts · 128d
Cool create the problem, make the public pay for it
someone@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 128d
The movies didn't lie, it was a real shit.
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 127d
We really need to address the schooling issue.