A Russian ship sank in mysterious circumstances. It may have been carrying submarine nuclear reactors to North Korea | CNN
https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/12/world/a-russian-ship-sank-in-mysterious-circumstances-it-may-have-been-carrying-nuclear-reactors-to-north-korea
110 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world
11 Comments
frongt@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 100d
Hmm, that makes sense, if they're too big to transport by rail. But still, why was it headed into the Mediterranean if they were going to be delivered to Vladivostok or North Korea? Is Russia building ships for North Korea in Sevastopol or Novorossiysk?
fullsquare@awful.systems · 3 pts · 100d
it was heading from baltic. well, maybe they used to in vladivostok, but probably no longer
also lots of heavy industry is where people live, that is in western part of russia. otherwise you have to haul steel all the way there, it would make complete sense to put the only nuclear reactor factory in area where you have all the specialists
couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 100d
These aren't newly built reactors
https://youtu.be/yctyqJbrB8o?t=2214&is=OHpYZGo2vKnTLjpU%3Ft%3D%3Ft%3D
36m16s
Dragomus@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 100d
This is not recent news ...
But for some odd reason I keep seeing this story pop up on random sites at least monthly this year.
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 100d
"This article is for subscribers only"
comrade_twisty@feddit.org · 8 pts · 100d
If it's any consolation, WW III will be subscribers only too.
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 100d
Free subscription with each draft notice.
MushuChupacabra@piefed.world · 5 pts · 100d
Well not anymore it isn't.
Sucks to suck.
thefluffiest@feddit.nl · 4 pts · 100d
It’s still sub-marine
MushuChupacabra@piefed.world · 2 pts · 100d
Most ships are so superficial. This one is deep.
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 100d
What else may it have been carrying?