Chat control

Pandora's iPhone, by Stuart Carlson, 2016. Still spot-on in 2026:

A backdoor for the good guys simply does not exist. Once you build it, hackers walk through, authoritarian governments walk through, and the rest follows.

The UK is pressuring for chat control right now. EU Chat Control initiatives keep popping up. We need to keep saying NO to this!

254 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world

11 Comments

Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 31 pts · 115d

And it is not only this.
It also has the danger to invoke "chilling effects", so self-censorship in normally private environments.
Chat control and similar ideas are anti-democratic and suppressive at their very core.

HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 115d

The "Backdoor for the Good Guys" is a myth.

No "Good Guys" ask for such an absurd vulnerability into someone's personal digital existence. Every single person in power asking for it knows what they're doing.

Airfried@piefed.social · 13 pts · 115d

Thank goodness hackers can't fit through that door so it's perfectly safe!

hobovision@mander.xyz · 11 pts · 115d (1 reply)

> Implying the FBI is not part of a repressive regime.

vanillama@programming.dev · 4 pts · 115d

Right?

Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 115d (1 reply)

Given that the organizations like the FBI can be politically weaponized, governmental use of backdoors is just as fraught as their use by hacker groups.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 9 pts · 115d

I was gonna say FBI is more of a threat than hackers are this point.

lena@gregtech.eu · 5 pts · 115d

Anything but etc.!

ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 115d

Tim Apple

Mac@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 110d

Every intel CPU since ~2008 has had a built-in backdoo: IME - Intel Management Engine

69420@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 114d

Now do the same comic, but they're all the same person.