Property tax cuts sound great — until your city can’t fund schools or police
https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article315909341.html?giftCode=927b8c9480a0c883d7844a7f877add9ae51d341f35fe4e2aaea7ac326d88057d
25 points · 14 comments · view on lemmy.world
14 Comments
dustyData@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 81d
If you can tax property, then you can tax unrealized gains of stock. Tax the billionaire class.
kibblebits@quokk.au · 8 pts · 81d
Property taxes are good. Inflated property values are bad.
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 80d
Property taxes are a regressive tax that causes lower income areas to charge a higher percentage of income in taxes. It basically costs the same amount of money to run a school no matter where it's located. If those taxes went into a state or national fund instead then they could be alocated more evenly without creating a higher burden on lower income areas.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 80d
Not at all. Some of us live in places with much higher property values/taxes so building the school is much more expensive. We live in high cost of living areas so all employees pay can be significantly more. And yes we may choose to spend more because we value our kids education more.
So I disagree with that contention, but completely agree that yes, paying for schools mostly from property taxes is hugely unfair. We need a “department” of “education” as part of the federal government, setting minimum standards for equity, inclusivity, education levels, and additional support for those who need it. Even better if it could be proactive, set higher standards, override those localities shortchanging our children
HubertManne@piefed.social · 1 pts · 80d
I can see that. My brother in law moved way out to the far-suburbs/neo-country. Then he has to send his kids to private school which if he lived in the most expensive burb with the best schools his property tax would be less than his combined with tuition. plus he gets less infrastructure and upkeep of same. we are talking unpaved roads where they throw sand down and barely plow.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 80d
Some people choose to live places with less infrastructure and support, and that’s a reasonable choice. But it’s not ok when it affects the education of the next generation. Parents may be the most important voice in raising children, but we as a society have a vested interest in them being well educated, and need our actions to reflect that
HubertManne@piefed.social · 2 pts · 80d
yeah its actually kinda funny because my wife and I have no kids and we vote for pretty much every school and park expansion/renovation (our town is pretty responsible and none of these are boondogles). Some folks though. Its like I want to live in a society where kids are educated and we have nice public spaces. I do wish more of this was funded on a national level.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 80d
Somehow they have funding for Flock cameras. Fuck your kids! We need to surveil them more than they need an education .
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 80d
my city sends 49% of it's budget on cops, fuck that
reddig33@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 80d
Funding public schools and police? THaT’s SoCialiSM!
No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 80d
Bruh, letting your property burn is the free market way, no firefighters nor emerging response for anyone, otherwise SoCiALiSm.
Don't even get me started on protecting clean water....
No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 80d
Where's the plan?
Even the article mentions the details are short of notions of a plan and mainly pushes raising the homestead exemption to unsustainable levels where the state will manage collecting from wealthy counties like MDC Broward and Palm Beach and transfer this into areas where tax collections are lower defunding services where the money is raised.
If Republicans want to do socialism they need to do math first, increasing Homestead exemption will not solve affordability when taxes are 1:3 to insurance.
Dadifer@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 81d
Paywall
silence7@slrpnk.net · -1 pts · 80d
It's a gift link so people who don't have software which removes the gift token from the URL and who have JavaScript turned on can access the article for free.
If you're in the 1% of the population for which this is not true, you can use an archive site to access a copy