I like to think they can see through her fake facade and don’t like her but have to tolerate her since she’s friends with another one of their friends. I also like to think they see her as someone who’s trying to attach herself to them for her own gain and get followers from their community since she knows her own is built on bots and could be wiped out with one click.
Agreed! I think they've never run in the same circles before, so they're trying to be welcoming, but it's all transactional on her end. I hope they see through it quickly.
Omg it was HORRIBLE. it sounds like bad acting. That's not her voice. It's like wannabe valley girl but she has a Canadian accent so it will never work!
Do you think she’s trying to talk like the younger women she met on the patio in TO or has she been watching a show she’s imitating? It just sounds ridiculous coming out of her mouth.
The audacity posting this. She does NOT look like a 21 year old fresh-faced ingenue. She doesn't even look young for her age, which makes this even more ridiculous. What is she fucking thinking? It's outrageous and beyond delusional. It seems she tends to go harder on the filters when she's around younger women. Just wow. It's likely she looks much closer to the mocked up image that shows what she might look like on the right. The side by side makes the deceit very clear.
In March 2026, the CRA announced crackdowns on influencers and is very focused on mega influencers. Here is a summary:
New Mandatory Platform Reporting Rules: Digital and social platforms operating in Canada are now legally required to send user income data directly to the CRA. The agency no longer relies on self-reporting; it already has the data before you even file your return.
AI-Driven Audit Matching: The CRA has deployed advanced machine learning and AI-powered data-matching tools. These systems automatically flag discrepancies between a creator's reported income and their actual digital footprint, cross-referencing brand campaigns, affiliate links, and online storefronts.
Social Media Scouring: Audit teams utilize open-source intelligence to explicitly audit public profiles. If a creator's tax return claims low income, but their Instagram or TikTok feed features high-end promotional vehicles, luxury clothing, or luxury vacations, the automated risk-scoring system triggers a formal manual review.
The Core Targets of the Audits. The CRA’s primary focus is on capturing unreported, non-monetary value and missed sales taxes.
The "Gifts as Cash" Rule: The CRA treats free PR packages, gifted clothing, electronics, skincare, hotel stays, and flights as taxable business income. Creators are being heavily audited for failing to declare the Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of these items. 😀
I'm sure it helps. According to the new regulations, even if Apple doesn't pay Sarah, she has to report the flight, hotel and any gifts (at market value) as taxable income. 😂
*The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers trips, free products, and other "gifts" received through brand or platform relationships as barter transactions and taxable business income.
Declaring the Trip as IncomeTaxable Value: The influencer must declare the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the trip (including flights, hotel, and the ticket value) as self-employed business income on their tax return.
No Exemption for Unpaid Work: The fact that the influencer is not paid in cash does not exempt the trip from taxation. The CRA treats non-monetary perks received for your work (e.g., attending an Apple event) the exact same as cash.
Intent Matters: The CRA looks at intent. If the influencer accepts the invitation with the expectation of generating content, building a brand, or engaging with an audience, it is considered business income rather than a personal gift. 😂
There is an address that people can send a letter to the CRA.
I wonder if she reported the $4,000 bike. Her original free car (the Van), did she pay tax on all the free stuff from her home and cottage reno? Like the new kitchen?
For every single item she is gifted, every hotel room, every trip to Club Med, Disney, etc., she owes the tax on that item, service, or trip, and she has to pay market value.
For example, the bike: she owes $535; the Club Med trip: $1,695; and the van: $10,450. The laser facials are $910. A couple of packs of Quickies for $26, a family trip to Disney (min $2, 300), the kitchen $6,500, all the clothing, she owes TAX on it all. ALL OF IT!
It's always been this way. This is why broadcast and publishing companies don't allow editors, producers or hosts to accept gifts over $300. Gifts under $300 must be approved. Trips must be approved because the companies paid the tax. Beauty products sent to magazines stay in the office, are used for testing or photography, and are then donated to a shelter or sold for donation.
The few items mentioned that Sarah and Shane received are a drop in the bucket, and they bring their tax owed to $20,721. Sarah is listed on many ranking charts as Canada's #1 influencer. She has posted being gifted all these items. There are clips of her stories where she shows off her freebies.
I really think she believes this is true because she was giving advice in an influencer thread. She’s taken an awful lot of no pay trips in the last few years and I would love to know if it’s being declared as income. From the outside it looks like she’s had a lot fewer paying jobs and I wonder how sustainable the business becomes with all the trips. Someone did mention the Club Med DR trip was valued at more than $10,000 without flights. I would like to see all these Influencers audited.
AN influencer still owes tax to the CRA if they receive a gift without a contract.
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) views gifts received in exchange for brand promotion or exposure as "barter transactions".
A formal contract is not required to establish this business relationship.
Key details of how the CRA handles this:
The Barter Rule: If you receive goods, services, or PR packages in exchange for an agreement to promote them (or if you simply post about them voluntarily), the CRA treats it as business income.
Fair Market Value: You must claim the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the gifted item. For example, if you are sent a free $1,500 camera to review, that $1,500 is counted as taxable business income.
Intent Matters: Genuine, unsolicited personal gifts (e.g., a birthday present from a fan) are generally non-taxable.
However, if the brand is sending products to you as an influencer to showcase on your platform, the CRA considers it taxable compensation.
Hi snarkers, don't mind all my posts; I want to give you the full CRA picture. Off to my 'big girl' job now. Enjoy your day.
Think about how influencers have been willfully ignorant about gifts. Compare the influencers' feeds and stories (regarding gifts, trips, and all their bragging) with those of former traditional media personalities and editors. You don't see mass gifting or trips. There are no PR boxes posted. (Except for a few greedy ones.) The rest of the former media are off the "freebee" radar.
Google AI:
Did the shift to influencer gifting hurt the traditional media advertising space and reduce tax income for the Canadian government?
Yes, these losses resulted in a significant net loss of tax revenue for the Canadian government. The rapid shift of advertising dollars away from traditional media companies toward influencers and foreign digital tech platforms directly reduced government revenue in several major areas:
Vanishing Corporate Income Taxes. Traditional Canadian media companies as major TV broadcasters, newspaper chains, and radio stations — historically generated robust taxable profits. As their advertising revenue plummeted (with conventional TV ad revenues down nearly 40%), these companies began posting multi-million dollar losses.
The Tax Impact: Corporations that operate at a net loss do not pay corporate income tax.
Massive Losses in Payroll and Personal Income Tax
Because 74 cents of every advertising dollar now leaves the traditional Canadian media industry, legacy companies were forced to cut costs aggressively. Between 2019 and 2024, the Canadian media sector lost more than 11,000 stable, salaried jobs.
The Tax Impact: High-paying, structured corporate jobs generate dependable income tax and payroll deductions (like CPP and EI). When these positions disappeared, the federal and provincial governments lost millions in annual personal income tax revenue.
The "Tax Leakage" of the Influencer Economy. While the influencer marketing economy grew rapidly, it did not immediately replace the lost tax revenue. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) faced distinct challenges collecting taxes from this new sector:
The Gift Loophole: For years, many influencers did not realize—or report—that free luxury trips, hotel stays, and gifted products legally count as taxable "non-monetary" business income.
Foreign Platforms: Much of the ad spend that bypasses local media goes straight to foreign parent companies (such as Meta, Alphabet, and TikTok). Historically, these global tech giants utilized legal tax loopholes to avoid paying Canadian corporate taxes on those revenues.
The Double Hit: Government Subsidies. Not only did the government lose tax revenue, but the crisis also forced them to spend taxpayer money to keep local journalism alive. To prevent the complete collapse of the news sector, the federal government had to introduce hundreds of millions of dollars in media payroll tax credits, subsidies, and aid programs – effectively turning a former tax-generating industry into a tax-funded one.
If you are interested, we can look into how the CRA is currently auditing influencers to recoup these funds, or explore Canada's new Digital Services Tax aimed at foreign tech platforms.
*There are newspaper articles from March 2026, as the CRA issued a press release. This times well with the loss of trust in influencers.
So what about alllllll the PR they receive whether it’s shown on their platform or not considered a gift no matter the value… or is it only taxable if it’s shown on their socials? Because they still received merchandise. Should they be returning it if they don’t use it and therefore not have to pay taxes on it?
This is the loophole. If something is sent without obligation to post about it, then it is not looked at as barter or a contractual obligation; therefore, they don't have to claim it. I would say a huge portion of the PR she gets falls under this category because brands just send stuff hoping she will say something. But there are very obvious times that you know she is only saying something because she has to, and I guarantee she isn't claiming those.
Yes, if they KEEP anything, they need to pay the tax on the item's MSRP.
In traditional media, when you borrow a product, say for a photoshoot (clothing, furniture, etc.), it goes back. It's not kept.
What a joke. Sick of her getting everything she wants handed to her all the time. All she has to do is mention something and here it comes for free. She doesn’t deserve a single thing she gets, she isn’t even a good influencer!!!!!
Thought about sounding like I have a low IQ and only talking about my belly and bra straps at work today to see if I could do nothing and still get paid. (I’d get fired honestly) Realized I could never act as stupid and dull as Bird even if I was paid. I don’t know how she does it and still looks herself in the filtered eyes!
Our love to know if Volvo, Disney, or any other company she works with thinks about so much vagina/sexual shares mixed in with family stuff including showing your under age children.
If I try to click on the name in my past messages when I was approved it says page not found. I’m not great at technology though 🤷🏻♀️ I’m not sure if I got blocked at some point. I was on the dirtydiet one (not sure if I can say full name on here)
Creator of the current birdshit Reddit snark 🙋🏻♀️ we’re a team of 4 trusted mods and request that when joining the community to please contribute to the discussions. We had a pretty significant breach a month or so ago where our personal insta pages / images were leaked by some parasite so we’re hyper vigilant about adding new members. Thanks for your patience fam! Happy 🐤💩 snarking!
Could I be added back? Everytime I go to request it says page not found I just creep and read the snark because people around me believe she’s a good person and I love having proof she’s not 🥲 same username! I was in dirty before the purge and in her old one too!
Oh and she wasn't 20. Her first was born when she was 21, going on 22. This pic is either immediately before her 21st birthday (conveniently on the last day of each year which lets her use the younger age for lots of things), or she's flat out lying about her age in the pic.
I am a woman in this demographic and would NEVER use the word elderly as an identifier. I don’t know if these comments are real or if the commenters are just batshit crazy. I would also never be throwing flowers at this one’s feet for taking and posting pictures of her body, talking about all her insecurities and foisting it on other women and pretending to be the saviour of women everywhere.
The headbands she keeps trying to pull off look goofy 🤣 also the diseased looking tongue is more of a concern than underwear lines nobody even gives a fuck about.
Anyone who thinks Sarah isn't filtering her photos and videos is completely delusional. Two screengrabs taken less than 1 second apart from her recent podcast clip. She is walking down the beach and if you watch in slow motion she is definitely ebbing and flowing.
Dumb-Dumb posted a story on her IG and the body filter is super glitchy. You can see the building wave and her hand tries to turn into the decorative grass. It's not helping her face either, it mashes it up, or maybe she has a mashed face because who knows what this bitch looks like IRL.
Agreed. This twit lifted her skirt/loose shorts to show L her ass and asked (no doubt) for a commentary on what L sees. L is Birdshits pet following the directors notes. It’s gross.
She is histrionic. She's a degenerate slob. Trash.
Sarah and her friends didn't replace magazines; they replaced tabloids. They are the Weekly World News: The definitive source for the bizarre.
Curious to know if 🐦💩 started following this creator after M reposted the video? Also curious to know if M blocked NK from following her or if NK decided to F off on her own.
Then I think she followed after M posted. I wonder if she uses the anonymous viewer to creep her? She did admit, while married to The Magician, she’s jealous of former partners so it would track.
what a complete fucking loser bird is. makes sense to me that she would be jealous of M. M’s online presence shows that she's actually cool and participates in the real world in meaningful ways. cool taste in music, lively irl social life, interesting/diverse hobbies, a real job that adds tangible value to society... bird’s online presence shows that she’s not even remotely cool and is a vapid pick-me grifter who leeches off society instead of contributing to it.
Does anyone believe that she’s really into all of this kitschy and/or children’s things. I’m not saying we can’t still enjoy things from our childhood. But to the degree that she pushes it I’m not buying it. I’m also not saying it’s wrong. I’m just questioning her “passion” for it. I think she does it for an angle or for the lure of a huge demographic.
Maybe! I work with a girl who is 35 and she lives in lala land. Disney/fantasy land. You can’t have a normal conversation with her. Even her engagement ring was a Disney collaboration.
164 Comments
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 25 pts · 76d
Was she afraid her young friends were going to steal her purse?
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
hahaha probably! She doesn't trust LGBTQ+, AND sheesh her face looks different! Looking like Nana K here.
Poofluencers@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
She is so awkward! Never truly at ease or comfortable in her skin.
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
Do these legs look like the same legs she posted on her story yesterday?! Be so for real 🤣
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
Hiding body. Confident queen. Forehead dent and all
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
Can’t help but wonder if these people really like her or if she shows up and they’re eying each other like “ugh she’s here?” Lol
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 76d
I like to think they can see through her fake facade and don’t like her but have to tolerate her since she’s friends with another one of their friends. I also like to think they see her as someone who’s trying to attach herself to them for her own gain and get followers from their community since she knows her own is built on bots and could be wiped out with one click.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 76d
I suspect every last one of them is either already an influencer of some sort or wants to be, so it's doubtful they have these thoughts at all.
Idontbelonghere@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 76d
Agreed! I think they've never run in the same circles before, so they're trying to be welcoming, but it's all transactional on her end. I hope they see through it quickly.
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 76d
Those shorts definitely don’t look as loose as they were in her look at me picture!
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
Those are shorts? They look like denim granny panties.
Adavison@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 75d
You can tell when it’s not her week with the kids. She just sits and does nothing. She books all her work when they are home so she can avoid them.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 75d
Her voice in this is nails on a chalkboard and she’s talking about a hair band. No one cares.
Uterusofsteel@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 75d
Omg it was HORRIBLE. it sounds like bad acting. That's not her voice. It's like wannabe valley girl but she has a Canadian accent so it will never work!
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 75d
Do you think she’s trying to talk like the younger women she met on the patio in TO or has she been watching a show she’s imitating? It just sounds ridiculous coming out of her mouth.
Uterusofsteel@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 75d
A combination of both I believe. Definitely got worse after hanging out with the youngins though.
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 74d
I think she tries to copy 💅in every possible way.
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 75d
She babbles on about the most mundane things, like who cares about this????
She’s so boring. Then she spent ages reposting about foods that don’t exist anymore. Her content sucks.
Poofluencers@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 75d
She’s feeling herself today that’s for sure. I wonder how she feels when she sees herself with the filter off?!
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 75d
She is! Must have had a nice evening with her ‘friend’.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 75d
The audacity posting this. She does NOT look like a 21 year old fresh-faced ingenue. She doesn't even look young for her age, which makes this even more ridiculous. What is she fucking thinking? It's outrageous and beyond delusional. It seems she tends to go harder on the filters when she's around younger women. Just wow. It's likely she looks much closer to the mocked up image that shows what she might look like on the right. The side by side makes the deceit very clear.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 75d
Your mocked-up version looks like the real Sarah Nicole Landry. Her face is always changing in impossible ways. Fucking fraud.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 73d
This pic is a joke right? Please tell me she didn't post this? 😆
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 75d
Well done!
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 70d
In March 2026, the CRA announced crackdowns on influencers and is very focused on mega influencers. Here is a summary:
New Mandatory Platform Reporting Rules: Digital and social platforms operating in Canada are now legally required to send user income data directly to the CRA. The agency no longer relies on self-reporting; it already has the data before you even file your return.
AI-Driven Audit Matching: The CRA has deployed advanced machine learning and AI-powered data-matching tools. These systems automatically flag discrepancies between a creator's reported income and their actual digital footprint, cross-referencing brand campaigns, affiliate links, and online storefronts.
Social Media Scouring: Audit teams utilize open-source intelligence to explicitly audit public profiles. If a creator's tax return claims low income, but their Instagram or TikTok feed features high-end promotional vehicles, luxury clothing, or luxury vacations, the automated risk-scoring system triggers a formal manual review.
The Core Targets of the Audits. The CRA’s primary focus is on capturing unreported, non-monetary value and missed sales taxes.
The "Gifts as Cash" Rule: The CRA treats free PR packages, gifted clothing, electronics, skincare, hotel stays, and flights as taxable business income. Creators are being heavily audited for failing to declare the Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of these items. 😀
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 70d
This is good news! I wonder if reporting them to the competition bureau flags them as well?
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 70d
I'm sure it helps. According to the new regulations, even if Apple doesn't pay Sarah, she has to report the flight, hotel and any gifts (at market value) as taxable income. 😂
*The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers trips, free products, and other "gifts" received through brand or platform relationships as barter transactions and taxable business income.
Declaring the Trip as IncomeTaxable Value: The influencer must declare the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the trip (including flights, hotel, and the ticket value) as self-employed business income on their tax return.
No Exemption for Unpaid Work: The fact that the influencer is not paid in cash does not exempt the trip from taxation. The CRA treats non-monetary perks received for your work (e.g., attending an Apple event) the exact same as cash.
Intent Matters: The CRA looks at intent. If the influencer accepts the invitation with the expectation of generating content, building a brand, or engaging with an audience, it is considered business income rather than a personal gift. 😂
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 69d
I don’t think she’s in compliance since she posted this, years ago, on Threads.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 69d
There is an address that people can send a letter to the CRA.
I wonder if she reported the $4,000 bike. Her original free car (the Van), did she pay tax on all the free stuff from her home and cottage reno? Like the new kitchen?
For every single item she is gifted, every hotel room, every trip to Club Med, Disney, etc., she owes the tax on that item, service, or trip, and she has to pay market value.
For example, the bike: she owes $535; the Club Med trip: $1,695; and the van: $10,450. The laser facials are $910. A couple of packs of Quickies for $26, a family trip to Disney (min $2, 300), the kitchen $6,500, all the clothing, she owes TAX on it all. ALL OF IT!
It's always been this way. This is why broadcast and publishing companies don't allow editors, producers or hosts to accept gifts over $300. Gifts under $300 must be approved. Trips must be approved because the companies paid the tax. Beauty products sent to magazines stay in the office, are used for testing or photography, and are then donated to a shelter or sold for donation.
The few items mentioned that Sarah and Shane received are a drop in the bucket, and they bring their tax owed to $20,721. Sarah is listed on many ranking charts as Canada's #1 influencer. She has posted being gifted all these items. There are clips of her stories where she shows off her freebies.
She could be a precedent-setting audit. 😂
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 69d
This is interesting. 😂 Does she think that if she says it, it's true?
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 69d
I really think she believes this is true because she was giving advice in an influencer thread. She’s taken an awful lot of no pay trips in the last few years and I would love to know if it’s being declared as income. From the outside it looks like she’s had a lot fewer paying jobs and I wonder how sustainable the business becomes with all the trips. Someone did mention the Club Med DR trip was valued at more than $10,000 without flights. I would like to see all these Influencers audited.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 69d
Same, she could really feel this one. Think of all the renovation items she accepted.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 69d
Yes for both the house and cottage.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 69d
AN influencer still owes tax to the CRA if they receive a gift without a contract.
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) views gifts received in exchange for brand promotion or exposure as "barter transactions".
A formal contract is not required to establish this business relationship.
Key details of how the CRA handles this:
The Barter Rule: If you receive goods, services, or PR packages in exchange for an agreement to promote them (or if you simply post about them voluntarily), the CRA treats it as business income.
Fair Market Value: You must claim the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the gifted item. For example, if you are sent a free $1,500 camera to review, that $1,500 is counted as taxable business income.
Intent Matters: Genuine, unsolicited personal gifts (e.g., a birthday present from a fan) are generally non-taxable.
However, if the brand is sending products to you as an influencer to showcase on your platform, the CRA considers it taxable compensation.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 69d
Hi snarkers, don't mind all my posts; I want to give you the full CRA picture. Off to my 'big girl' job now. Enjoy your day.
Think about how influencers have been willfully ignorant about gifts. Compare the influencers' feeds and stories (regarding gifts, trips, and all their bragging) with those of former traditional media personalities and editors. You don't see mass gifting or trips. There are no PR boxes posted. (Except for a few greedy ones.) The rest of the former media are off the "freebee" radar.
Google AI:
Did the shift to influencer gifting hurt the traditional media advertising space and reduce tax income for the Canadian government?
Yes, these losses resulted in a significant net loss of tax revenue for the Canadian government. The rapid shift of advertising dollars away from traditional media companies toward influencers and foreign digital tech platforms directly reduced government revenue in several major areas:
The Tax Impact: Corporations that operate at a net loss do not pay corporate income tax.
The Tax Impact: High-paying, structured corporate jobs generate dependable income tax and payroll deductions (like CPP and EI). When these positions disappeared, the federal and provincial governments lost millions in annual personal income tax revenue.
The Gift Loophole: For years, many influencers did not realize—or report—that free luxury trips, hotel stays, and gifted products legally count as taxable "non-monetary" business income.
Foreign Platforms: Much of the ad spend that bypasses local media goes straight to foreign parent companies (such as Meta, Alphabet, and TikTok). Historically, these global tech giants utilized legal tax loopholes to avoid paying Canadian corporate taxes on those revenues.
If you are interested, we can look into how the CRA is currently auditing influencers to recoup these funds, or explore Canada's new Digital Services Tax aimed at foreign tech platforms.
*There are newspaper articles from March 2026, as the CRA issued a press release. This times well with the loss of trust in influencers.
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 69d
Wow! Thanks for all the info! I really hope this leads to the downfall of these crooks like 🐦💩, ⛰️ and 📦
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 69d
So what about alllllll the PR they receive whether it’s shown on their platform or not considered a gift no matter the value… or is it only taxable if it’s shown on their socials? Because they still received merchandise. Should they be returning it if they don’t use it and therefore not have to pay taxes on it?
bunniculamonroe@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 69d
This is the loophole. If something is sent without obligation to post about it, then it is not looked at as barter or a contractual obligation; therefore, they don't have to claim it. I would say a huge portion of the PR she gets falls under this category because brands just send stuff hoping she will say something. But there are very obvious times that you know she is only saying something because she has to, and I guarantee she isn't claiming those.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 69d
Yes, if they KEEP anything, they need to pay the tax on the item's MSRP. In traditional media, when you borrow a product, say for a photoshoot (clothing, furniture, etc.), it goes back. It's not kept.
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 70d
I seriously hope the CRA audits the fuck out of these grifting parasites!
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 69d
I’m going to keep reporting them!
Honey_Lemon1105@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 68d
I wonder if the companies sending PR report it for their taxes? Like the product itself and the shipping etc would be a taxable expense, right?
mapper@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 70d
best news ive heard in a while tbh
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 69d
I wonder if just posting in stories evades AI from detecting these little jaunts?
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 69d
It probably does. It would be a shame for her if someone took screenshots of her #gifted stories and sent them off with a list.
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 69d
😉☺️😁
HippoBloat@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 72d
Guess who has a volvo in the laneway
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 72d
I fucking despise her
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 72d
What a joke. Sick of her getting everything she wants handed to her all the time. All she has to do is mention something and here it comes for free. She doesn’t deserve a single thing she gets, she isn’t even a good influencer!!!!!
dapperdashmarzipan739@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 72d
Me but I pay for mine 😤
Lisamarie@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 72d
🙄😡 no surprise at this point! She just gets whatever she wants for being a fake, shitty person! I can’t stand her!
Poofluencers@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 72d
Thought about sounding like I have a low IQ and only talking about my belly and bra straps at work today to see if I could do nothing and still get paid. (I’d get fired honestly) Realized I could never act as stupid and dull as Bird even if I was paid. I don’t know how she does it and still looks herself in the filtered eyes!
BirdsaLiar@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 71d
Our love to know if Volvo, Disney, or any other company she works with thinks about so much vagina/sexual shares mixed in with family stuff including showing your under age children.
bellaportuguesexo@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 71d
Disney I’m sure loves it. Disney loves pedos.
BirdsaLiar@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 70d
You’re not wrong
BirdsaLiar@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 71d
*I’d
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 72d
Seriously?! 😳 😡 I hate her!
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 72d
I’m not surprised.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 73d
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 73d
The Reitmans one always sends me 🤣🤣🤣
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 73d
It's my absolute favourite; it's the real Sarah Nicole Landry 😆
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 73d
Sends me!!!! The video is top tier!
Coconut1388@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 71d
The women’s health shoot will always be a good example of her real face too lol https://www.womenshealthmag.com/life/a43593004/sarah-nicole-landry-naked-essay/
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 71d
My favourite.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 73d
She’s the biggest shapeshifter I’ve ever seen!
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 76d
Traitors won a Canadian Screen Actors Guild award. Why isn’t Birdie taking all the credit for the win?
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 69d
idea and images from Birds Snark on Reddit
Frequent_staff@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 68d
I can’t unsee this now. LOL
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 68d
She is in love with herself!😜
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 68d
No kidding! I just came here to post a question. How many hours a day does this twat spends eye fucking herself in a mirror or through her phone?
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 68d
What a fucking dickhead
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 68d
She's crazy for her filtered face. What a weirdo.
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 68d
“let me take a picture of myself so people can look at me”. Isn’t that the weirdest idea ever!!! Hey look at me.
Glowpop@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 67d
And it's always the exact same pose/face she eye fucks herself doing. Same hair. expression, earrings, sunglasses.
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 69d
Lmao I can’t
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 69d
Wow lol. Stop!!! Bwhahhahaha Twins!
Laineyberg@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 69d
Could you please add me 🙏 Ecberg68. I’ve been waiting and the papaya on Reddit I was on just says it’s pending and I can’t message the mods 🤷🏻♀️
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 68d
If you aren't in yet.. Send another request and I'll let you in.
Laineyberg@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 68d
If I try to click on the name in my past messages when I was approved it says page not found. I’m not great at technology though 🤷🏻♀️ I’m not sure if I got blocked at some point. I was on the dirtydiet one (not sure if I can say full name on here)
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 68d
I approved you :)
Notacommenter@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 67d
are you able to add me too? I've messaged too and it still says my request is under review. Suspicious-Formal802
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 67d
Creator of the current birdshit Reddit snark 🙋🏻♀️ we’re a team of 4 trusted mods and request that when joining the community to please contribute to the discussions. We had a pretty significant breach a month or so ago where our personal insta pages / images were leaked by some parasite so we’re hyper vigilant about adding new members. Thanks for your patience fam! Happy 🐤💩 snarking!
mapper@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 67d
this comment should be pinned to the top if possible :)
Crunchyc@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 64d
Do you mean the dirty Diet Coke one?
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 64d
Yes
Crunchyc@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 64d
Thanks
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 67d
I just added you!
sn0wway22@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 67d
Could I be added back? Everytime I go to request it says page not found I just creep and read the snark because people around me believe she’s a good person and I love having proof she’s not 🥲 same username! I was in dirty before the purge and in her old one too!
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 67d
I just added you!
Squanch1244@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 67d
Any chance I can come back too? Squanch124 on Reddit. Feels like it's been months
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 66d
You should be in!
Adavison@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 66d
Is there a new Reddit? I can’t find it. How can I if anyone knows. I’ll dm you from m reddit so you know I’m safe MsDavison492
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 68d
Says you’re in!
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 66d
When you just can’t let someone have their day!
Lisamarie@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 66d
Always has to be about 🐦💩! She’s such an insufferable jerk! 🙄
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 66d
It’s always all Sarah, all the time!
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 66d
I have never even had the thought to celebrate my birthing day on my children’s bday. It took my brain a sec to process this. How strange.
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 66d
🐦💩is the only one that would do this..well her and her stupid narcissistic followers.
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 66d
I hope those kids realize this someday!
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 66d
Why does she think she's so special having a kid at 20? She has always been an attention seeker.
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 66d
She’s not fucking special. I too had my kids the same age as her 🙄
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 66d
Right, I was 18..
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 64d
Proud of you 🫶🏼 A baby who had a baby 🥹
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 63d
Yep, I was 19. 🤷♀️
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 61d
Oh and she wasn't 20. Her first was born when she was 21, going on 22. This pic is either immediately before her 21st birthday (conveniently on the last day of each year which lets her use the younger age for lots of things), or she's flat out lying about her age in the pic.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 61d
She always has to lie, 21 going on 22. Already married for a year. Not a teenage pregnancy or unexpected.
Exoticcauliflower@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 65d
Always has to make things about her.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 63d
Does this but doesn't celebrate her own mother's "birthing day" because I guess only Sarah gets both.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 68d
I think she’s looking a little rough these days and she was, clearly, holding her breath in this pic
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 68d
Must’ve forgot to turn on the filter that makes her look like a teen
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 68d
Who’s face is this 😂
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 73d
I am a woman in this demographic and would NEVER use the word elderly as an identifier. I don’t know if these comments are real or if the commenters are just batshit crazy. I would also never be throwing flowers at this one’s feet for taking and posting pictures of her body, talking about all her insecurities and foisting it on other women and pretending to be the saviour of women everywhere.
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 67d
Hmm I wonder what 🐦 gets out of following this acct
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 67d
I’m sure she follows for the faith content. I’m sure she isn’t interested in the glp 1 stuff.
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 67d
Is Hello Fresh on that guide? I just read the comments from 🐦 and ⛰️ on the 🧑🎨’s vulva art. The 🐦 doth protest the 🌭 comment!
Exoticcauliflower@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 65d
Any bets on when c and her hard launch their queer relationship? Maybe in a parade?
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 65d
I was thinking June 25-28 with some long winded bs post and stories of her partying all weekend 🤷♀️
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 73d
The headbands she keeps trying to pull off look goofy 🤣 also the diseased looking tongue is more of a concern than underwear lines nobody even gives a fuck about.
Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 73d
Bloody idiot yammering on about nothing. What a fucking moron
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 73d
And this is also a rerun. She talks about VPL and bra straps fairly often.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 73d
That’s not the face she wore in DR!
Honey_Lemon1105@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 67d
Anyone who thinks Sarah isn't filtering her photos and videos is completely delusional. Two screengrabs taken less than 1 second apart from her recent podcast clip. She is walking down the beach and if you watch in slow motion she is definitely ebbing and flowing.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 68d
Dumb-Dumb posted a story on her IG and the body filter is super glitchy. You can see the building wave and her hand tries to turn into the decorative grass. It's not helping her face either, it mashes it up, or maybe she has a mashed face because who knows what this bitch looks like IRL.
Glowpop@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 67d
Lmao the extreme body-hiding baggy clothing, and in California go figure. She is so lame.
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 67d
Wow! Camera quality on the iphones is top notch /s
Adavison@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 66d
I love wearing baggy sweatshirts in California lol 🙄🙄🙄
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 74d
Are we going to have some vein trauma?
BirdsaLiar@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 74d
So her camera just happened to be on her ass to capture a conversation? A child, even her voice, shouldn’t be content. I hate this dimwit.
Poofluencers@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 73d
Agreed. This twit lifted her skirt/loose shorts to show L her ass and asked (no doubt) for a commentary on what L sees. L is Birdshits pet following the directors notes. It’s gross.
Rarepotato@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 74d
Holy shit that dent in her pinkie from her phone use 😳
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 64d
Nothing says child safety liking post their pic and location.
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 63d
Who posted that? Was 🍋’s face not covered?
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 63d
M posted it and no it’s not covered
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 63d
I truthfully thought M would be better than this considering at one point she didn’t want to be shared on socials
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 63d
Way to go internet safety!🙄
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 65d
Bird 💩 lying through her snaggle tooth makes me want to run and grab this drink from DQ 😵💫
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 70d
🤣 Travel Chic Barbie
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 70d
She is histrionic. She's a degenerate slob. Trash. Sarah and her friends didn't replace magazines; they replaced tabloids. They are the Weekly World News: The definitive source for the bizarre.
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 70d
J hates her so much lol
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 70d
Wouldn’t be surprised if she picks a University as far away as possible.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 69d
I don’t think she’s going too far since she’s back on the cheer team next year
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 70d
I can imagine a lot of the youngest childcare falls on her teenage girls.
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 70d
This picture speaks volume
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 70d
Another influencer went for lunch with Sarah and posted this in 2024.
Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 70d
Whoa! Where’s this picture from?
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 68d
Curious to know if 🐦💩 started following this creator after M reposted the video? Also curious to know if M blocked NK from following her or if NK decided to F off on her own.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 68d
Bird is an asshole.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 68d
I hope M blocked her and also hope she blocked Bird. I wonder if C followers this creator and that’s why Bird follows too.
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 68d
C does not follow
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 67d
Then I think she followed after M posted. I wonder if she uses the anonymous viewer to creep her? She did admit, while married to The Magician, she’s jealous of former partners so it would track.
mapper@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 67d
what a complete fucking loser bird is. makes sense to me that she would be jealous of M. M’s online presence shows that she's actually cool and participates in the real world in meaningful ways. cool taste in music, lively irl social life, interesting/diverse hobbies, a real job that adds tangible value to society... bird’s online presence shows that she’s not even remotely cool and is a vapid pick-me grifter who leeches off society instead of contributing to it.
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 67d
Bikini content in bathrooms constantly... But no one cares... Right Birdie. Pathetic
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 67d
Well said!
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 67d
I wonder if 🐦 was sent this
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 73d
“Fav to follow” So she can steal these words and claim them as her own in some long winded toilet poetry.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 67d
She doesn’t even try.
Adavison@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 70d
Question - I do t know a lot about Star Wars. When she posts about it - is she dumb about it as well ? Like her posts about baby yoda today ?
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 69d
Does anyone believe that she’s really into all of this kitschy and/or children’s things. I’m not saying we can’t still enjoy things from our childhood. But to the degree that she pushes it I’m not buying it. I’m also not saying it’s wrong. I’m just questioning her “passion” for it. I think she does it for an angle or for the lure of a huge demographic.
bellaportuguesexo@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 69d
Maybe! I work with a girl who is 35 and she lives in lala land. Disney/fantasy land. You can’t have a normal conversation with her. Even her engagement ring was a Disney collaboration.