When AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/c74b30e9505cb8d3?ICID=continue_without_subscribing_reg_first

32 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world

12 Comments

one_old_coder@piefed.social · 9 pts · 84d (4 replies)

Because most bosses and managers hate people whatever the cost.

Akasazh@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 84d (2 replies)

People are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes.

They want a fully automated money machine but don't understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.

Inucune@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 83d

See, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy's workforce so you keep making money. AI can't do your job, right?

siera@jlai.lu · 2 pts · 34d

Yeah, they love money and hate other human that could take part of this money. But they forgot that they are human too.

jtrek@startrek.website · 2 pts · 84d

Many managers and owners are large children with poor emotional regulation.

Malyca@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 83d

Haven't we learned yet? Cruelty, cruelty is why and cruelty is the point.

lemonhead2@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 84d (2 replies)

simple. ai is more expensive now ... but won't be in a few years. also ai won't form unions and will work overtime, so people with more money than they can spend in a lifetime can earn even more money to improve their social status ... and build more data centers

tacosanonymous@mander.xyz · 4 pts · 84d

I don’t think that’s true. Economies are a balance and what they’re pushing for is a gross imbalance. It can’t work and they’re either stupid af or trying to ruin everything.

teft@piefed.social · 2 pts · 83d

Wont form unions? Those dipshits ceos are going to be so upset when they find out about vendor lockin and annual increases in fees.

Zos_Kia@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 83d (2 replies)

I think the answer is : nobody is being replaced, and certainly not by AI. These companies have been over-hiring for decades now, for a variety of reasons, and layoffs before quarterly reports are nice because they pad the bottom line without having to increase revenue. "Ai layoff" is a nice way to phrase "economic restructuring" without spooking the investors. Hell if you're lucky it might even get you a bump on the stock market.

I've been in the industry for a few years now and can guarantee you there are not enough systems deployed to replace workers in any significant numbers, and those that exist are far from good enough.

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 83d (1 reply)

there are not enough systems deployed to replace workers in any significant numbers, and those that exist are far from good enough.

Land-rush purchasing, though.

Zos_Kia@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 83d

I'm not sure what that means ?