Huh. This is right in line with a theory I developed last year based on constraint fields. I coined that term, on first glance here, to account for the same things these ghost particles account for. Except mine aren’t, particles; they are more like an interaction paradigm, the results of which, the ones we can observe anyway, are what we would call the physical universe. I should read up more on this and get into the math.
So, I've always thought if ghosts were real, they'd be some scientifically explained natural phenomenon and not the souls of the dead. This proves it. Kinda.
6 Comments
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 100d
Wow, that is the fastest I've ever had an article go completely over my head. I think I understood one sentence.
Steve@startrek.website · 3 pts · 100d
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 100d
Tag yourself, I'm most readers.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 100d
Huh. This is right in line with a theory I developed last year based on constraint fields. I coined that term, on first glance here, to account for the same things these ghost particles account for. Except mine aren’t, particles; they are more like an interaction paradigm, the results of which, the ones we can observe anyway, are what we would call the physical universe. I should read up more on this and get into the math.
mlfh@lm.mlfh.org · 1 pts · 100d
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 1 pts · 100d
So, I've always thought if ghosts were real, they'd be some scientifically explained natural phenomenon and not the souls of the dead. This proves it. Kinda.