It’s refreshing to see actual, sincere responses in the midst of the political poo flinging that’s mostly bots these days.
Yes, Hunter Biden was an addict who smoked crack. He’s not denying it. It’s the truth. He’s also calling people out on their bullshit theater around it.
What the fuck is with children and sensitive cucks censoring adult humor? This shit is so annoying. Don't read and repost it if a word hurts your feelings.
It's just that this is oftentimes how you already find it online because commercial platforms can be really strict because they use shitty AI algorithms that delete stuff for no reason all the time
I forced myself to read through a couple pages of that sham book about his hard drive, it tried to mislead people by placing right next to each other an account of Hunter supposedly purchasing sex work and two completely unrelated accounts of sexual misconduct as if to imply Biden was responsible for them.
I can imagine people with low reading comprehension being easily misled.
People aren’t targeting the walled garden, they’re targeting one facet of a person’s life, in this case addiction. People love to use a low point in someone’s life as a permanent reference point regardless of whatever they do with their life after that era has passed. They’re not using his addiction as a means of attacking privilege or politics, they’re reinforcing social standards that addicts are a lesser class incapable of ever being anything other than an addict. A nuanced criticism of Hunter and the difference between consequences for wealthy addicts and poor addicts is one thing, low hanging fruit of “you were once an addict so you’re automatically a piece of shit” only keeps addiction a baseline for dismissing another person.
My point was more centered on walled garden censorship, not the context of the post. I don't have anything against Hunter Biden, well — no more than I would anyone with as much money as his family has.
Edit: which really isn't much, relative to the Trump crime family that is.
36 Comments
Zachariah@lemmy.world · 152 pts · 88d
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 23 pts · 88d
Ty
tidderuuf@lemmy.world · 125 pts · 88d
Thank God it's censored, imagine if the FCC or children saw those fucking words.
ApeNo1@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 88d
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 88d
Not the rhyme-noscerous, surely‽
Saber_is_dead@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 88d
Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis?
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 87d
Did Steve tell you that perchance?
. . .
Steve…
akwd169@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 87d
People try to diss me
Say my rhymes are sissy
Why, because I rap about reality
Like me and my grandma having a cup of tea?
Aint no party like my nanas tea party
Hey, hoo
I love these guys
Nasan@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 87d
why? why? be more constructive with your feedback.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 6 pts · 88d
TBH I wouldn't put it past the current FCC, but I don't think Impact has any TV broadcast rights to take away?
After Sattelite all censorship is voluntary.
Nobody@anarchist.nexus · 47 pts · 88d
It’s refreshing to see actual, sincere responses in the midst of the political poo flinging that’s mostly bots these days.
Yes, Hunter Biden was an addict who smoked crack. He’s not denying it. It’s the truth. He’s also calling people out on their bullshit theater around it.
Madison420@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 88d
It's weirder to point the finger at him anyway given the secret services history with cocaine.
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 45 pts · 88d
What the fuck is with children and sensitive cucks censoring adult humor? This shit is so annoying. Don't read and repost it if a word hurts your feelings.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 6 pts · 88d
I don't see the point of it but I also don't see any issue with it. We can all read what it says.
I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 87d
Fuck you.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 87d
Omnipitaph@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 87d
Hey! There's a line, no cutting!
Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 88d
It's just that this is oftentimes how you already find it online because commercial platforms can be really strict because they use shitty AI algorithms that delete stuff for no reason all the time
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 2 pts · 87d
YouTube is the reason the word "Unalive" is mainstream.
Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 87d
It was actually TikTok, not YouTube
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 30 pts · 88d
This isn't Reddit, no need for censorshi*
skankhunt42@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 88d
You can say shit here.
bufalo1973@piefed.social · 4 pts · 88d
Maybe it's a way to write censorship and censorshit at once. 🤷♂️
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 2 pts · 87d
Yup. And also censorshia, censorshib, censorshic...
Railing5132@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 86d
Censorshi[p,t]
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 2 pts · 87d
Unless you're Holmes. In which case - no "shit", Sherlock.
MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca · 27 pts · 88d
Gotta respect someone who can handle that stuff with humour and grace.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 14 pts · 88d
I forced myself to read through a couple pages of that sham book about his hard drive, it tried to mislead people by placing right next to each other an account of Hunter supposedly purchasing sex work and two completely unrelated accounts of sexual misconduct as if to imply Biden was responsible for them.
I can imagine people with low reading comprehension being easily misled.
20cello@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 88d
Fuck with the censorship
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 88d
Fuck online censorship.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 9 pts · 87d
I wouldn't forget my dregs either!
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 87d
Walled gardens can suck a fuck, wish people would wake the fuck up.
backalleycoyote@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 87d
People aren’t targeting the walled garden, they’re targeting one facet of a person’s life, in this case addiction. People love to use a low point in someone’s life as a permanent reference point regardless of whatever they do with their life after that era has passed. They’re not using his addiction as a means of attacking privilege or politics, they’re reinforcing social standards that addicts are a lesser class incapable of ever being anything other than an addict. A nuanced criticism of Hunter and the difference between consequences for wealthy addicts and poor addicts is one thing, low hanging fruit of “you were once an addict so you’re automatically a piece of shit” only keeps addiction a baseline for dismissing another person.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 87d
My point was more centered on walled garden censorship, not the context of the post. I don't have anything against Hunter Biden, well — no more than I would anyone with as much money as his family has.
Edit: which really isn't much, relative to the Trump crime family that is.
backalleycoyote@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 86d
Gotcha, I misinterpreted.
Someplaceunknown@leminal.space · 6 pts · 88d
Based