NYT hitpiece endorsement

124 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world

6 Comments

Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml · 21 pts · 108d

there is always an excuse for US imperialism

sem@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 108d (4 replies)

Full article if anyone interested https://archive.ph/s9gEZ

grue@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d (3 replies)

That's way less of a "hit piece" than advertised. It's more about how the US is putting her in a difficult position.

geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 108d (2 replies)

Or she can keep giving Washington what it wants: more arrests, more extraditions, more cooperation and ever-higher-profile political targets. That might buy time with Mr. Trump, but it would let the United States define the terms of Mexico’s fight against cartel power. Ms. Sheinbaum would look less like a president asserting control than a leader enforcing accountability on Washington’s terms.

But Ms. Sheinbaum can still take charge of this moment. She could use U.S. pressure as leverage to start serious anticorruption investigations, remove compromised officials, disrupt local protection networks and force her party to accept changes it might otherwise resist. She could work to reform Mexico’s security and justice apparatus, rebuild cooperation with Washington from a position of strength and reassert her government’s role as a domestic enforcer of the rule of law. Not because the United States demands it, but because Mexicans need it.

Kinda sounds to me like NYT wants her to do what Trump wants but do it by herself.

Now i'm not going to say that fighting the cartel isn't good. But it could unchain a massive civil war, which might be even more devastating than the cartels itself right. It could put Mexico into a precarious position to be easily dominated by US divide-and-conquer strategies.

Cartels already have many US weapons and dealings with the CIA. I'm sure the CIA is willing to pour some oil on that fire as always. Let two parties destroy eachother and then sweep in to claim the spoils after everything has burned down. Sheinbaum is walking a fine tightrope and at least she's lifting some Mexicans out of poverty, which in turn will also weaken the cartels.

apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 108d

Plus that headline reads as she needs to be replaced. NYT headlines have a way with pointing to the goal.

eldavi@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 108d

Now i’m not going to say that fighting the cartel isn’t good.

the entire narrative that the us wants is that of a narco-terrorist controlled state and the article frames the discussion this way -- completely ignoring that the us gov't gives the cartels weapons and access to banking that can only be obtained by explicit approval of the us gov't; don't fall for this narrative.