That depends on if what the article says about them bothers you. The top comment is kinda misleading by just listing all the name of companies mentioned without putting why they were mentioned. Kape isn't on the list for lying about privacy, they are on the list for owning 4 VPN companies.
There's a reason why most of their advertising is about protecting yourself from the privy eyes of the advertisers, and going around content locking, and not actual privacy.
Every organization aand or company gets corrupted the second money becomes an issue somewhere or when they hire some manager who "will make things more efficient"
It markets itself to journalists, activists, and people in countries where being monitored by a government is a real risk. Its CIO had signed a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ over his role in building surveillance infrastructure for a government targeting those same categories of people.
At least this one I can understand, the guy probably knows pretty well what to protect from, and also may have changed the opinion on if you should attack journalists or protect them
That would've been better disclosed at hiring time, not when someone found out, of course
13 Comments
Substance_P@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 63d
TLDR:
NordVPN, ExpressVPN, Kape Technologies, PureVPN, Hola VPN, Facebook Onavo.
burning_beard@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 63d
With Kape actually encompassing:
JokeDeity@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 62d
Oh fuck, I've been using PIA for years and years, should I switch?
stankmut@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 62d
That depends on if what the article says about them bothers you. The top comment is kinda misleading by just listing all the name of companies mentioned without putting why they were mentioned. Kape isn't on the list for lying about privacy, they are on the list for owning 4 VPN companies.
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu · 27 pts · 63d
There's a reason why most of their advertising is about protecting yourself from the privy eyes of the advertisers, and going around content locking, and not actual privacy.
TheV2@programming.dev · 7 pts · 63d
Not too long ago the major VPN providers' advertising was about privacy and security though.
Zwiebel@feddit.org · 1 pts · 62d
Still is
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 63d
Happy not to see mullvad there.... Yet.
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 20 pts · 63d
AFAIK, it’s privately held by the founders, who are largely driven by ideals and have no intention of selling it.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 58d
That's good but don't trust it blindly, ever
Every organization aand or company gets corrupted the second money becomes an issue somewhere or when they hire some manager who "will make things more efficient"
vk6flab@lemmy.radio · 8 pts · 63d
While this video is austensibly about Incogni, you'll soon discover just how much it's about VPNs and who owns them.
https://youtu.be/JFI1CfnDJxY
sukhmel@programming.dev · 7 pts · 63d
At least this one I can understand, the guy probably knows pretty well what to protect from, and also may have changed the opinion on if you should attack journalists or protect them
That would've been better disclosed at hiring time, not when someone found out, of course
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 62d
Still been using windscribe for the past few years. Still haven't had or seen any issues. It's pretty cheap and works great.