Aren't we on this form of social media because we inherently disagree how larger forms (X, FB) are ran and who runs them?
I don't necessarily agree with the implementation, but I can definitely see why a reduction in people using those social media could be a net positive for the country.
Though no disagreement about a 11% increase being shocking, and thats despite lifting the two child benefit cap!
3 Comments
RubberDuck@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 91d
It is far better to protect them from social media than to protect them from poverty /s
Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 91d
Aren't we on this form of social media because we inherently disagree how larger forms (X, FB) are ran and who runs them?
I don't necessarily agree with the implementation, but I can definitely see why a reduction in people using those social media could be a net positive for the country.
Though no disagreement about a 11% increase being shocking, and thats despite lifting the two child benefit cap!
Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app · 2 pts · 91d
Seems like a reason to change how those larger forms run and who runs them then.
No algorithms, no dark patterns. No information systems, controlled by billionaires, with a vested interested in what information is shown to whom.
Or we can do nothing about the problems, and instead invade your privacy