Lawmakers and advocates condemn ‘disastrous’ decisions that allow Trump officials to strip away migrant protections
Lawmakers and immigration advocacy groups on Thursday sharply denounced two US supreme court rulings that allowed the Trump administration to strip certain immigration protections and fundamentally reshape the asylum system.
Dozens of groups, advocates and members of Congress called the court’s decisions “disastrous” and “cruel”, while the Trump administration, Republican lawmakers and anti-immigrant groups celebrated the rulings.
“Today, Trump’s loyalists in the supreme court have joined forces with him to deny immigrants’ internationally recognized human rights and advance an authoritarian, white-supremacist agenda at home,” said the Illinois congresswoman Delia Ramirez, a Democrat. “The supreme court’s decisions put more than 350,000 TPS holders at risk of deportation and countless more asylum seekers’ lives in danger.”
10 Comments
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 50d
No reason to put that in quotes.
CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 50d
Respectfully disagree. Supreme "Court" should be the journalistic standard worldwide. They don't practice law there anymore, if ever. Court is not a descriptor, it's a brand.
Almacca@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 50d
They're stretching the meaning of the word "supreme" to it's limits as well.
CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 50d
They are supreme examples of a few things....
Drusas@fedia.io · 1 pts · 49d
This is how quotes are used in British article titles, to indicate an exact quotation. It's not the way we use it in the US, to indicate that something is "so-called".
switcheroo@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 50d
Did nazi this coming...
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 50d
I accuse the sun of being a source of UV rays
clgoh@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 50d
Bad analogy. The Sun has no intent of being a source of UV rays.
AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 50d
Then they deserve the guillotine
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 50d