cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1273137/victoria-proposes-forcing-social-media-platforms-to-unmask-anonymous-accounts-accused-of
Victoria proposes forcing social media platforms to unmask anonymous accounts accused of vilification: “These reforms will help victims of online hate find out who’s really behind the keyboard.”
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/big-tech-must-prevent-hate-and-keep-kids-safe
8 Comments
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 18 pts · 35d
And next year political dissidents
TIEPilot@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 35d
*But we'll use these laws to silence whistle blowers or those that disagree w/ the following draconian laws we put in place after...
Cybersteel@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 34d
What about escalation? Escalation? Track their IP? They use proxy servers. Subpoena their ISP? They use VPNs.
CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 34d
Vilification is illegal now?
jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 34d
Differs from libel/slander which is false and negative speach/writing about someone in that vilification doesn't necessarily have to be proven false, just abusively framed.
XLE@piefed.social · 2 pts · 34d
Ironically, the people trying to make this into law are contemptible based on their self ascribed identity of pushing for the law.
CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 34d
Too much for me. People shouldn't be punished just for being an asshole. The way these are presented are they are paired with hate speech to give them credence. Hate speech is something entirely different. Contempt also shouldn't be against the law. It may not be nice or even socially acceptable, but it's not illegal.
jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 32d
I agree - there is a big difference between being socially shunned for being an asshole or vocalising contempt and being publicly outed and then criminally punished for it.