In a statement to the Guardian, Catholic group Fit for the Kingdom said nobody had stopped Divine Playhouse’s organisers from publishing, fundraising, speaking or performing, but that they welcomed the landlord’s decision to “refuse to allow their premises to host hateful content”.
Ummm... contradicting themselves in a misguided effort to sound reasonable? Be offended, express the fact that your offended by it, and have the mutual respect to have a dialogue.
Whether the landlords acted on their own, or were asked by these groups to. Unfortunately it seems this rescinding action is really going to blow up in the landlord's faces.
2 Comments
blind3rdeye@aussie.zone · 10 pts · 12d
It would be a very bad precedent to allow the landlord to evict people solely based on the landlord finding them morally offensive. The tenant's behaviour was not illegal, or damaging, or slanderous or anything like that - but the landlord found it 'offensive', and used that as a reason for eviction. If that is allowed to stand, then basically no renter is safe.
That's a lot of people who are hurt by this decision, and a lot of lost economic activity amongst people who need it most - apparently crushed without effort or thought by representatives of billionaires.
Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone · 6 pts · 12d
Yeah, I mean maybe theres more to the landlords case than is understood or included in this article, but it seems prettu cut and dru the way a court would jave to land on this unless we're gonna have a minor legislative emergency in NSW.