Why am I not surprised that this guy is using AI to explain why people shouldn’t be given an advocate of some kind against inevitably being crushed by capitalism?
my theory is that AI will take over the world silently and subtly. my first inkling of this was when the tariff policies appeared to be generated. regardless of if they actually were, things like that will continue to happen until consulting a model on policy becomes routine, and then checking outputs gets more lax… that’s how they take over. we give them control over the reigns of government one step at a time, all the time convinced we’re still the ones making the decisions.
5 Comments
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social · 11 pts · 29d
This dude should be run out of office. He's not doing the work the taxpayer pays him to do.
Deebster@infosec.pub · 8 pts · 29d
It's not the prompt, but yeah that's just unfiltered LLM output that he clearly didn't even glance over before reading out.
Rumbelows@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 29d
Why am I not surprised that this guy is using AI to explain why people shouldn’t be given an advocate of some kind against inevitably being crushed by capitalism?
nigel@piefed.social · 2 pts · 29d
To save a click, this was Canadian politician Bill Oliver
chrash0@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
my theory is that AI will take over the world silently and subtly. my first inkling of this was when the tariff policies appeared to be generated. regardless of if they actually were, things like that will continue to happen until consulting a model on policy becomes routine, and then checking outputs gets more lax… that’s how they take over. we give them control over the reigns of government one step at a time, all the time convinced we’re still the ones making the decisions.