If there was a tolerance on the threshold, everyone would just calibrate to the tolerated threshold. There's no point in having one.
I've tripped a speed camera at < 1km/h over the threshold too. I typically drive somewhere between the speed limit and the threshold, as it causes the least trouble.
The graphic is incorrect. Hamilton exceeded the pit lane speed limit by 0.6 km/h, and there was a tolerance of +0.5 km/h, which he exceeded. So you’re very correct.
8 Comments
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 28 pts · 8d
Which is, if you take a closer look, actually more than 0.
Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 8d
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · -4 pts · 7d
This is why people hate modern F1, and especially modern F1 fans.
blackn1ght@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 6d
Do you think he should not have received a penalty for this then? Where do you draw the line?
bananabread@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 7d
It has been like this for decades.
pHr34kY@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 8d
If there was a tolerance on the threshold, everyone would just calibrate to the tolerated threshold. There's no point in having one.
I've tripped a speed camera at < 1km/h over the threshold too. I typically drive somewhere between the speed limit and the threshold, as it causes the least trouble.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 7d
The graphic is incorrect. Hamilton exceeded the pit lane speed limit by 0.6 km/h, and there was a tolerance of +0.5 km/h, which he exceeded. So you’re very correct.
QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 7d
lmao