The only sensible option seems to be A or C in my humble opinion.
I do not understand if A allows AI generated content form upstream?
I am no dev but A seems like the best option at the moment. Debian has a solid and stable base and have been getting along just fine without AI so far. I would not like to see if fall over because of this kind of tool.
C is probably more likely as it is hard to avoid but I am not sure if this is a good decision. Debian is the base for so many distro's that it feels like an unnecessary risk to open up so much like this. Maybe Debian could create its own LLM trained on Debian for Debian? cuts out the licensing issues and keeps the community in control?
Maybe Debian could create its own LLM trained on Debian for Debian? cuts out the licensing issues and keeps the community in control?
That’s… not how it works, unfortunately.
I think what you’re getting at would be strict criteria along the lines of:
A human must take full responsibility for any contribution.
And only with fully disclosed, labeled assistance from “legally unproblematic” LLMs. The Nemotron or Olmo series would be examples: apache licensed, open and auditable datasets, can be fully controlled by Debian community.
They could enforce some specific harness, or mathematically verifiable output, like some other projects already do. I know less about the technical details of that, though.
2 Comments
coolasbreeze@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 14d
The only sensible option seems to be A or C in my humble opinion.
I do not understand if A allows AI generated content form upstream?
I am no dev but A seems like the best option at the moment. Debian has a solid and stable base and have been getting along just fine without AI so far. I would not like to see if fall over because of this kind of tool.
C is probably more likely as it is hard to avoid but I am not sure if this is a good decision. Debian is the base for so many distro's that it feels like an unnecessary risk to open up so much like this. Maybe Debian could create its own LLM trained on Debian for Debian? cuts out the licensing issues and keeps the community in control?
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 14d
That’s… not how it works, unfortunately.
I think what you’re getting at would be strict criteria along the lines of:
They could enforce some specific harness, or mathematically verifiable output, like some other projects already do. I know less about the technical details of that, though.