Don't worry, I'm sure our friendly, fascist techno-overlords at Google will apply their new, arbitrary evaluation of what is and isn't "explicit" in an unbiased manner that will only protect our children and certainly won't be used as an excuse to target women, people of color, and queer folks.
/s in case the dripping sarcasm was not palpable enough
Your submission in "Multiple Major ASMR Accounts Suddenly Removed From YouTube Over ‘Explicit Content’" was removed for The myth that poor, innocent men are the victims of vile women has always been a justification to discriminate against women and ban them from public life. With the current purge of erotic and queer content from all kinds of platforms such rhetoric will not be tolerate on Ghazi. .
Seems like the content industry in general is evolving towards cashing in on thirst, even if it's not ASMR. The most banal tutorial about any craft or activity suddenly has some not-so-accidental innuendo, or the creator chooses the most not-so-innocently-revealing attire, or acts weird-but-it's-all-in-your-mind towards the tools or materials...
Nothing against whatever someone wants to put out there, but if you are after the tutorial and the algorithm feeds you the plausibly deniable softcore it's a bit exhausting.
8 Comments
GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 23 pts · 29d
Don't worry, I'm sure our friendly, fascist techno-overlords at Google will apply their new, arbitrary evaluation of what is and isn't "explicit" in an unbiased manner that will only protect our children and certainly won't be used as an excuse to target women, people of color, and queer folks.
/s in case the dripping sarcasm was not palpable enough
alapakala@quokk.au · 8 pts · 29d
It's not even that, it's about forcing people that make Google money to dox themselves.
yessikg@fedia.io · 2 pts · 22d
Letting puritans take over the internet was a mistake
yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 29d
squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 16 pts · 29d
Your submission in "Multiple Major ASMR Accounts Suddenly Removed From YouTube Over ‘Explicit Content’" was removed for The myth that poor, innocent men are the victims of vile women has always been a justification to discriminate against women and ban them from public life. With the current purge of erotic and queer content from all kinds of platforms such rhetoric will not be tolerate on Ghazi. .
guillem@aussie.zone · 6 pts · 29d
Seems like the content industry in general is evolving towards cashing in on thirst, even if it's not ASMR. The most banal tutorial about any craft or activity suddenly has some not-so-accidental innuendo, or the creator chooses the most not-so-innocently-revealing attire, or acts weird-but-it's-all-in-your-mind towards the tools or materials...
Nothing against whatever someone wants to put out there, but if you are after the tutorial and the algorithm feeds you the plausibly deniable softcore it's a bit exhausting.
shads@leminal.space · 6 pts · 29d
Ah you've seen Hands On Katie. My wife's first reaction was "Why is her channel logo a boob?" and ten seconds later: "Right"
guillem@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 29d
Hadn't seen that one specifically, but yeah, looks like a good example to me.
shads@leminal.space · 4 pts · 29d
She has also embraced the slop, so no great loss that I can't watch it.