Trump’s legal team is asking Lett to allow Trump to go back and change the language of the suit, so that his lucrative business dealings as president are not subject to public scrutiny.
What exactly is your argument here? Trump initiated the lawsuit, and it was against news media. I'm not really very sympathetic about that kind of free-speech-chilling stuff to begin with. But then what he's objecting to is having details about his family financial operations become public, which I also am not terribly sympathetic to.
If you want to argue that Trump is being treated unreasonably here, I think that you're going to have to actually make a case for why.
11 Comments
aramis87@fedia.io · 70 pts · 21d
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 56 pts · 21d
Trump meets media he can’t bully into submission, flakes. TACO.
DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world · 47 pts · 21d
Plaintiff: "Move to dismiss"
Defendant: "Defense objects."
Judge: "Case -- you what now?"
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 45 pts · 21d
People say a lot about how Trump doesn't have a clue how discovery works, but wow. He really does not.
funkreddit@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 21d
Taco time!!! Everyday is taco time
SurelyItsNotPossible@sh.itjust.works · -28 pts · 21d
0rang3 m4n b4d: part #589420
frunch@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 21d
I mean, when there are that many examples--he's clearly actually bad
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
tal@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 21d
What exactly is your argument here? Trump initiated the lawsuit, and it was against news media. I'm not really very sympathetic about that kind of free-speech-chilling stuff to begin with. But then what he's objecting to is having details about his family financial operations become public, which I also am not terribly sympathetic to.
If you want to argue that Trump is being treated unreasonably here, I think that you're going to have to actually make a case for why.
BigShammy80@feddit.org · 1 pts · 21d
His argument is that Trump is a bad person.
Says everything that he wants to stop the lawsuit to "hide" his illegal money deals, or also known as inside trading among other things
IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 20d
From the post history, there's no argument, just a desperate and sad need for attention.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 20d
Do you think the leader of a “free” country trying to bully and silence journalists is a good thing?