SEC bought access to over a billion airline records to track travelers, no warrant required
https://www.techspot.com/news/113365-sec-bought-access-over-one-billion-airline-records.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/113365-sec-bought-access-over-one-billion-airline-records.html
15 Comments
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 24 pts · 27d
Why the hell is the SEC doing this?
Guess I’ll read the whole article to find out.
So…?
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 26d
So:
The SEC is controlled by regime flunkies now. This is an end-run of the 4th amendment.
Monument@piefed.world · 22 pts · 26d
How is this not unlawful search?
I understand that because the use of and purchase/sharing of this kind of data (which for the purposes of my arguments includes any data broker data, including the data from Flock license plate readers) is not considered illegal due to a lack of consumer protection laws. But how is the government acquiring and using this data not considered a subversion of due process?
DeckPacker@piefed.social · 5 pts · 26d
They don't care, law doesn't really matter anymore
boaratio@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 26d
They count as business records. No need for a warrant.
village604@adultswim.fan · 2 pts · 26d
Because the majority of the SC are traitors.
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz · 0 pts · 25d
Does anyone really have expectations of privacy when then buy a ticket and then fly in a plane full of people to a different city, stat or country?
Monument@piefed.world · 1 pts · 25d
Yes. I expect privacy like I have a right to it.
Greyghoster@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 25d
“The records contained passengers' names, credit card numbers used to buy tickets, departure and arrival cities, flight dates and numbers, and the agency responsible for the sale.“
And it includes flights that are totally outside the US.
A good reason to not use your primary credit card as who knows who has access to this data. A debit card linked to a burner savings account is probably best.
Techranger@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 25d
Aren't banks subject to KYC rules? At least, in the US?
Greyghoster@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 24d
My worry is card theft. Using a a card with a low limit or a debit card on an account that doesn’t have much money in it seems the way to limit exposure. All the accounts are legitimate in your own name.
The whole idea that your data can be sold by a middleman or anyone also seems on the nose but that’s the way it is.
PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au · -14 pts · 27d
Every single law enforcement agency does this and far worse. The FBI atf NYPD (even if you've never been to that time zone) and postal inspector service all have your analytics page from pornhub.
But it's suddenly a problem when the FTC starts doing it.
ContactClosure@lemmus.org · 30 pts · 26d
This argument is fucking stupid and you should feel bad for using it.
Bad things that have already happened do not justify more bad things happening.
ZeroCool@piefed.ca · 0 pts · 26d
non_burglar@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 25d
Uh, the FTC and the SEC aren't the same thing.
PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au · 1 pts · 25d
I swear I typed sec. 2tf?