Program on California ballot could cut home down payments to 3%. What’s the catch?
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/prop-37-home-loan-california-22383702.php?hash=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc2ZjaHJvbmljbGUuY29tL2NhbGlmb3JuaWEvYXJ0aWNsZS9wcm9wLTM3LWhvbWUtbG9hbi1jYWxpZm9ybmlhLTIyMzgzNzAyLnBocA%3D%3D&time=MTc4NjkyNTg4MTc4NQ%3D%3D&rid=M2Y3MDg4NjktOGM1My00ZTUyLWEwNzUtNGNkOWNlYTA2ZGM2&sharecount=MQ%3D%3D
7 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world
6 Comments
meat@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 12d
The catch will likely be higher total prices.
terranoid@lemmy.cafe · 1 pts · 12d
In today's news... Borrowing more money means paying back more money, and now Joe with the weather
blarghly@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 12d
Also, decreasing the required downpayment increases the number of people who can make that downpayment, which increases competitive pressures for a limited number of homes, which....
say it with me
raises the prices of homes.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 3 pts · 12d
ugh. in the 2008 crises and earlier ones things like this exacerbated it. monkeying with the loans just ends up getting people into real estate they can't afford. We need to have good housing that is 3x the median income and lower if we really want people to be housed.
zabadoh@ani.social · 2 pts · 12d
Removepaywall
blarghly@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 12d
The catch is that
The math is simple. If you want more people to have homes, you need to build more homes.