Chromebooks are objectively the worst kind of computer

348 points · 37 comments · view on lemmy.world

37 Comments

WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi · 53 pts · 2y (2 replies)

we need laws that require companies to unlock boot loaders when they drop support, or at least provide the means to do so.

JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee · 40 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Or just always? I buy a device, I want full control over it.

Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 2y

That is not too much to ask.

rshalom@kbin.social · 25 pts · 2y (13 replies)

Not really true. Plenty of Linux distributions dropped 32bit support years ago and 32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years (last ones were some Intel Atoms released around 2010).

jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de · 30 pts · 2y (3 replies)

When talking about Linux desktops it includes distros like Debian, who will support i386 until, at least 2028. Even some fast moving distros like OpenSuse Tumbleweed still support i386.

hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 2y

I'm running crunchbang++ on my i686 box.

roguetrick@kbin.social · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Can I play command and conquer on all i386 Linux install? Otherwise I'm sticking with DOS.

umbrella@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I have Linux running strongly on two laptops from 2007. If I still had my old Dell from 2003, I'd bet I could get the latest Puppy Linux running on it. Maybe even something like Debian or Arch32, if I maxed out the RAM.

notTheCat@lemmy.fmhy.net · 2 pts · 2y

I've tried Arch32 a while ago, the project isn't that well maintained (like I appreciate they're trying), I've had MX Linux before, worked great, just a bit outdated, I moved my 32bit machine to Void Linux, it seems to have the best support yet ! I'm running cutting edge kernel and dev tools on that old fart

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y

I’m inclined to do this with my old iMac and MacBook from 12 years ago, but I can’t think of anything to do with them after. Donate them maybe?

thejodie@programming.dev · 4 pts · 2y (4 replies)

"32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years"

I don't follow. The i386 is almost 40 years old now. Can you elaborate?

vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 2y (3 replies)

it may have began 4 decades ago, but what matters is that only one decade ago new hardware was still being released.

thejodie@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)

And new processors stopped supporting x86-32 a decade ago?

KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 1y

Except with that new 64 bit only thing Intel is trying to do, all x86_64 processors have 16-bit and 32-bit mode for backwards compatibility reasons, the processors actually start at 16-bit mode and are raised by the UEFI (or previously, the OS/bootloader) to 64-bit mode. In fact, if your UEFI supports CSM, you can flash MS-DOS 6.22 onto a USB stick and boot from it, and it'll treat it as a floppy drive (many BIOS implementations use floppy disks to emulate usb mass storage devices).

vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de · 0 pts · 2y

nope, new processors still do. At least on intel/amd processors. it's only software that decided to drop support

Astroturfed@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Ya, 64 bit was becoming more common/standard 16ish years ago with vista right? I remember I had to get vista even though I didn't want to because it had support for 64 but.

tabularasa@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Chromebooks, if they fit into the use case, are fantastic. All day battery life, boot instantly, seamless migrations to a new device. I got one of these for my parents, grandparents, etc, and I'll never look back.

Astroturfed@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

And windows works fine for most tech illiterate people who just need to use the web and type up word docs/use Excel. Most normal folks aren't tech literate enough or have no reason to bother.

dot@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 2y

I replaced ChromeOS with Linux forever ago when they dropped support for my hardware. It would be a brick if not for Linux.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y (5 replies)

ChromeOS uses the Linux kernel ...

hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 2y (2 replies)

So does Android. It's been torn apart and locked down so much, however, that it becomes a totally different OS.

loutr@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 2y (1 reply)

The Android kernel is the upstream Linux LTS kernel with custom patches applied, like most desktop distros. The Android OS is an entirely different tech stack.

hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y

Thankyou.

looz@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I recall it being gentoo based at least early on.

theshatterstone54@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 2y

Yes. Still is. Don't kniw why you were downvoted. Maybe some people are confusing the ChromeOS base with Crostini (a Debian container)

sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Forgot my laptop charger at the office for a week long event this past week and no time to recover it from the office. Had a 13 year old system76 laptop in the closet. Grabbed a spare external SSD (had an internal HDD), put the latest version of Ubuntu on it, and it worked flawlessly for the week without an issue. I maintain a dotfiles repo and keep backups of everything on b2 using rclone that encrypts/decrypts the files. Took less than hour to have my entire workflow ready to go on a new install without relying on proprietary spyware (icloud/one drive).

Astroturfed@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y (1 reply)

That's great except that all sounds like some crazy complex jibberish to most folks. Unfortunately most of the public needs a no technical skills required workstation.

sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y

You make a solid point. I don't know shit about fixing cars and I am a decade behind on home repair skills after spending most of my life geeking out on Linux.

In the middle I suppose their is an argument to be made that software support doesn't need to stop after a few years. Point I was trying to convey, which I admit is just one anecdote, is that my modern setup worked flawlessly on hardware older than 10 years.

Kolanaki@yiffit.net · 4 pts · 2y (1 reply)

This implies that LeapFrogs are better computers.

hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y

Well, LeapFrogs are for kids. Chromebooks are supposed to be for... students, I guess?

RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

At least our children may suffer a little less from those abominations.

CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y (5 replies)
[ removed ]
hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y (4 replies)

Damn! What architecture is it?

CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)
[ removed ]
hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Wow, that's an old one. I guess your best bet is FreeDOS, then.

CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
dot@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 2y

The three finger swipe between tabs gesture is pretty sweet though and I wish I could have it on other operating systems

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 2 pts · 1y

A computer used to just be a person who did math.

I wanna get Doom running on one of them.

Draconic_NEO@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 2y

Unless you used Ubuntu 32 bit, then they'll just drop you like a sack of potatoes, in that regard Canonical is no better than Google

Sunshine@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y

Linux phones supported for 10 years looking towards Google promising a bare 7 years.