There is a real risk that will become the attitude though, no need for security researchers, the LLMs got us covered. Great if true but it's probably not.
I had a blindspot and didn't really knew what CVE's was. Digging a little:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/cve.html
"Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CVE®) numbers were developed as an unambiguous way to identify, define, and catalog publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities.
6 Comments
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 17 pts · 2d
Using LLMs to scan code finds more bugs now.
Cyber@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 2d
And at the rate they're finding the bugs, they'll all be found by the end of the year.
Then no more bugs and all the LLMs can be shutdown.
InnerScientist@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2d
I see you're a project manager. Have you considered running the ai at 1200% for one month instead?
Mondez@lemdro.id · 6 pts · 2d
There is a real risk that will become the attitude though, no need for security researchers, the LLMs got us covered. Great if true but it's probably not.
Cyber@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 2d
TBH, I think everyone's playing with the new thing and a bunch of people will just move on to the next big thing (augmented 3d post-realism AI?)
Then, it'll settle down into decent workflows and become more organised... it'll just be painful until that happens.
Sims@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 2d
I had a blindspot and didn't really knew what CVE's was. Digging a little:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/cve.html "Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CVE®) numbers were developed as an unambiguous way to identify, define, and catalog publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities.
This article talks about op's chart specifically: https://www.howtouselinux.com/post/why-linux-kernel-cves-are-exploding-from-500-to-nearly-2000-per-release