The Lion King composer ordered to pay comedian after $27m lawsuit over podcast joke backfires

https://thetab.com/2026/09/02/the-lion-king-composer-ordered-to-pay-comedian-after-27m-lawsuit-over-podcast-joke-backfires

If you missed this whole saga, here’s a quick rundown. Lebohang Morake, better known as Lebo M, wrote the iconic opening lyrics “Nants’ingonyama bagithi Baba,” which is written in Zulu. Elton John did the music, and Tim Rice wrote the lyrics.

Lebo M sued comedian Learnmore Jonasi for $27 million and accused him of intentionally mocking “the chant’s cultural significance with exaggerated imitations” in a viral podcast clip.

It came after the comedian went on the One54 podcast in February and claimed that the famous chant translates to: “Look, there’s a lion. Oh my God.” The podcast host replied in shock: “You’re joking. That is not what that means! This whole time I thought it was like this like this beautiful, majestic.” The comedian then insisted that was “exactly what it means”.

The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Los Angeles, and Lebo M alleged that Jonasi said the translation “as authoritative fact, not comedy”. They also alleged that the comedian intentionally misrepresented “an African vocal proclamation grounded in South African tradition”.

Lebo M eventually decided to completely drop the lawsuit, but the comedian then demanded that the composer pay him $40k in compensation to cover his legal bills. In the latest update on Friday, 28th August, Judge Josephine Staton granted his request.

49 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world

6 Comments

Makhno@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 1d

What a stupid thing to try and sue someone over holyshit. The arrogance

magnetosphere@fedia.io · 13 pts · 1d (2 replies)

This left me wondering what the actual English translation is. The one I got is “Here comes a lion, Father.”

digger@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Are you telling us this as authoritative fact or comedy?

magnetosphere@fedia.io · 3 pts · 1d

lol a fact. That is what a translation website told me.

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 12 pts · 1d

When failing to recognize sarcasm goes horribly wrong.

usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 1d

Even if it was stated as an "authoritative fact", wouldn't you need to prove they actually lying (and trying to cause damage) and not just mistaken? Plus what justifies the high amount? How didn't they just get laughed out of the room by every lawyer they talked to??

Diddlydee@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 1d
[ removed ]