But it’s understood that shortening all the races by a uniform amount was regarded as the lesser of several evils. The commercial rights holder in particular has been very sensitive to criticism of the new regulations, and shortening just a few races would inevitably make the need to do this a talking point during those weekends. This would give more exposure to the widespread view that the rules are not fit for purpose.
I'm too tired to comment but I guess it kind of speaks for itself anyway.
Some purists may be aghast at shortening grands prix but this is not a new concept. In 1958, as part of a wider package of changes including a ban on alcohol-based fuels, maximum race lengths were cut from 500km or three hours to 300km and two hours.
It really makes the opposite point: this rule hasn't been touched since 1958, and yet they feel the need to change it now!
4 Comments
Coelacanth@feddit.nu · 11 pts · 7d
I'm too tired to comment but I guess it kind of speaks for itself anyway.
ambitiousslab@feddit.uk · 12 pts · 7d
I also love this bit:
It really makes the opposite point: this rule hasn't been touched since 1958, and yet they feel the need to change it now!
slartibartfast141@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 7d
And that's all that matter. As long as the veneer stays shiny, it doesn't matter what's underneath.
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 7d
So the only way to fill their broadcasting advertising slots would be to slow the cars down further?