Fdroid
Fdroid doesnt seem to have any llm-related policy about that yet
- https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/work_items/575
- https://f-droid.org/en/docs/Inclusion_Policy/
- https://forum.f-droid.org/t/does-f-droid-have-a-formal-policy-on-libre-ai/33279/
Izzyondroid
Izzyondroid has an exclusion policy for lmm-slopped apps and they need to pass some checks first
- https://izzyondroid.org/docs/general/AppInclusionPolicy/#ai-policy
- https://codeberg.org/IzzyOnDroid/repodata/issues
Vibe-coded apps will be rejected.
Apps acting as front-end for LLMs as outlined in point 6 above, or integrate with such services, will be rejected.
Readme, Changelogs and similar documentation files are allowed to include LLM-generated texts, but the code itself should be free of it.
Using LLMs for research, brainstorming, inspiration, debugging, look-ups, and comparable „read-only“ tasks, is acceptable – provided their output is not included in the app's code.
4 Comments
Zykino@programming.dev · 2 pts · 3d
Izzy allow non-open source apps. They say they will check, but how can they? Already with the source on hand it is not always easy to determine if the code is from am AI so on parts where sources are not available…
BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 3d
Hmm it seems like they approve proprietaey components under some exceptions, dunno how they could test for llm-slop. But either way, they tend to ask the developer for llm use disclosure, so a developer could lie and have their app passed (though if somehow it's proven they used llms in unwanted way, they'd have issue). Also I guess the developers woild have to justify a proprietary component and theyd have to hide that it's partial purpose is llm code. Shrug
https://izzyondroid.org/docs/general/AppInclusionPolicy/#code-and-license
mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com · 1 pts · 3d
What definition of "vibe coded" are they using?
BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 3d
From what I understand from the rest, they (at least) dont want any llm output to be inside the code of the project