LLMs are not [intelligence] and do not possess an [ego]. However, LLMs produce output as if it has an ego. LLMs personifies itself.
The outputs of these LLMs cause users to be misled.
Full Text : https://drive.proton.me/urls/EC2XGEAARG#1URjpqiO1G0W
LLMs are not [intelligence] and do not possess an [ego]. However, LLMs produce output as if it has an ego. LLMs personifies itself.
The outputs of these LLMs cause users to be misled.
Full Text : https://drive.proton.me/urls/EC2XGEAARG#1URjpqiO1G0W
10 Comments
breadsmasher@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d
wtf does any of this mean
KEI@lemmy.zip · -4 pts · 1d
how about think of your intelligence?
uen3@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1d
You posted an AI generated summary of 1 page of your [project? thesis? manifesto? IDK, you didn't say ] with no context and no explanation. All anyone can do is click your link, which goes to a suspicious cloud storage drive- and get a message that it's an html file too big to download. Is it intelligent for me, a random person on the internet who doesn't have any idea who you are, to download that? No. So I didn't. Most other people didn't. You have failed at your attempt to communicate on Lemmy.
Maybe the more intelligent way to use an internet message board is:
KEI@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 1d
That’s a nice thing to say. Thank you for speaking clearly and properly. Judging a link as suspicious is your own will, and trusting and reading it is also your own will. Communication is interaction, not one side’s will, right?
The things I hear should be good. What I spit out is good too.
breadsmasher@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d
cool. thanks for the clarification.
KEI@lemmy.ca · -1 pts · 1d
Not at all
breadsmasher@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d
yes thats the clarification you gave. “Not at all”
KEI@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 1d
just think about your intelligence again
breadsmasher@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1d
ok explain
KEI@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 1d
it's up to you