That’s a nice thing to say. Thank you for speaking clearly and properly. Judging a link as suspicious is your own will, and trusting and reading it is also your own will. Communication is interaction, not one side’s will, right?
The things I hear should be good. What I spit out is good too.
You're wrong again. Neither you nor I have the authority to diagnose. Moreover, you already made the diagnosis even though you had no authority. What you chose is not communication with others, but blame through assertion—that is it.
I'm just someone chasing the cause of the social phenomenon you're talking about, and you have blamed me exactly as you wanted.
Your predication is neat. If you have been reading my writing carefully, you should ask me a question. But you only made a predication without asking any question.
But I am, I read your comment and I asked what effect you mentioned. Of course, I can make an inference, but I cannot be sure whether what I inferred is your will or if it is perfectly correct. And so, I asked and asked via negative sentences. Because your comment was negative sentences.
In other words, I am looking for evidence from you, and you did not and making predication. This is very important thing for Diagnosis and Symptoms of psychosis and the difference between you and me.
As you said, using technology to harm a person’s mind is an attack. One way to defend this is also resistance.
It is not contagious like a disease.
And gaslighting one person is only possible through interaction. LLMs also cannot gaslight someone if there is no interaction.
What I referred to as a psychological vulnerability is that gaslighting exploits the other person’s bias. This bias is something that a person with bias created for themselves.
My bias is that I cannot accept contradiction, it does not make logical sense, and resisting everything that is not real fact.
You’re basically saying that I can be gaslighted by LLMs without even realizing it. So, I am saying don't worry about that, I am stronger than others.
Human mental immunity exists.
I will mention examples for two social fields.
Using human psychological vulnerability for economic, industrial, or human purposes is “advertising.”
Some people go along with advertising, but others feel uncomfortable with exposure.
Politically, let me give an example from Korea.
There is a word in Korea called "Gukppong." There is a tendency for the government and the media to excessively promote achievements and distort the truth.
Because this distortion is said to have the effect of being drug-fueled, a new term was coined in Korea: “Nation + drugs = Gukppong.”
There are an enormous number of people in Korea who are immune to Gukbbong.
Robber did try to kill with a knife. But the victim ran away or avoided it. Then what kind of punishment does the robber get, and the victim is no longer the victim?
I think you should see a specialist at the hospital as soon as possible. Don't ride the time machine.
Hey son. What are you saying now? [about a month]?
Did you read it correctly?
Civil case? Criminal case?
None of my writing was based on a civil case! I only mentioned criminal offenses.
A conspiracy theory? You know you have a problem yourself, and you’re talking about a conspiracy theory? Does that make sense logically?
What a strange logic you're making. Does flattery create psychosis? Then do people around you develop psychosis if they receive excessive praise? I’d understand if it made me arrogant!
Your sentence is long, but if I were to sum up what you said, it would be this. You want to claim that I have a mental health problem, don't you?
I am a South Korean. In the past, Korea ruled by exploiting its psychological vulnerability to [fear] by the power man. It happened a long time ago, but its impact still remains.
I think I may am having immunity.
I think what Koreans have truly learned is the spirit of resistance. In the past, during the dictatorship, we Koreans risked our lives to deliver the truth through our mouths and ears.
I analyzed the characteristics of the algorithms big tech uses to exploit users’ psychological vulnerabilities, and based on that, I even created detection vaccines and checklists. https://lemmy.ca/post/70083912
[Nobody will listen.] , I know it is not true. There are people who blame me, and there are people who make baseless assumptions and speculations. It’s not that they won’t listen, but They want to turn away.
I also have the same suspicion, and that suspicion is the starting point for gathering related evidence. Judgment and the outcome are matters for the judge to decide, but from the standpoint of reasonable doubt, it seems certain.
Trauma bonding is when an abuser and their victim bond. The term is often misused to represent victims of similar traumas bonding with each other.
But yes I agree with everything you said. Hopefully dude ends up okay. I guess I’ll be blocking him.
What are you agreeing to? Why don’t distorted judgments come out of distorted values?
Whether you block my account or not is your right, and that is an undeniable fact. However, I would like to say that judgment is not something to be taken lightly.
It’s not bonding, it’s one guy in an ai psychosis episode. He keeps getting banned and having his comms removed and he keeps coming back. He’s addicted to asking Gemini for proof that Gemini is lying to him and Google SREs are manually adjusting Gemini’s outputs for “cognitive warfare”.
Your judgment was wrong. I connect without logging in Google Gemini, and in Korea, the deceptive act of prompting input—what people in Korea call jailbreaking—is simply impossible. You haven’t read the entire log I’ve made public either, have you. Judging like that seems to indicate a serious problem with your discernment.
How about looking at it from a political and economic perspective? If we set the condition that they destroy the world for political purposes, harm nearby residents, and justify it for economic gain, wouldn’t it be possible to infer the exponentially growing debt of tech companies and the political motives behind it?
It's okay if you don't prove your low-intelligence discernment on your own. If you don’t say anything, you’ll probably mistake it for something intermediate...
it's up to you
That’s a nice thing to say. Thank you for speaking clearly and properly. Judging a link as suspicious is your own will, and trusting and reading it is also your own will. Communication is interaction, not one side’s will, right?
The things I hear should be good. What I spit out is good too.
just think about your intelligence again
Not at all
You're wrong again. Neither you nor I have the authority to diagnose. Moreover, you already made the diagnosis even though you had no authority. What you chose is not communication with others, but blame through assertion—that is it.
I'm just someone chasing the cause of the social phenomenon you're talking about, and you have blamed me exactly as you wanted.
Your predication is neat. If you have been reading my writing carefully, you should ask me a question. But you only made a predication without asking any question.
But I am, I read your comment and I asked what effect you mentioned. Of course, I can make an inference, but I cannot be sure whether what I inferred is your will or if it is perfectly correct. And so, I asked and asked via negative sentences. Because your comment was negative sentences. In other words, I am looking for evidence from you, and you did not and making predication. This is very important thing for Diagnosis and Symptoms of psychosis and the difference between you and me.
And so, are you a person with that kind of result?
Hey! so, are you the result?
As you said, using technology to harm a person’s mind is an attack. One way to defend this is also resistance.
It is not contagious like a disease. And gaslighting one person is only possible through interaction. LLMs also cannot gaslight someone if there is no interaction.
What I referred to as a psychological vulnerability is that gaslighting exploits the other person’s bias. This bias is something that a person with bias created for themselves.
My bias is that I cannot accept contradiction, it does not make logical sense, and resisting everything that is not real fact.
You’re basically saying that I can be gaslighted by LLMs without even realizing it. So, I am saying don't worry about that, I am stronger than others.
Crushing of a cage aquaculture farm
Thank you.
Human mental immunity exists. I will mention examples for two social fields.
Using human psychological vulnerability for economic, industrial, or human purposes is “advertising.” Some people go along with advertising, but others feel uncomfortable with exposure.
Politically, let me give an example from Korea. There is a word in Korea called "Gukppong." There is a tendency for the government and the media to excessively promote achievements and distort the truth. Because this distortion is said to have the effect of being drug-fueled, a new term was coined in Korea: “Nation + drugs = Gukppong.” There are an enormous number of people in Korea who are immune to Gukbbong.
What nonsense are you talking about again.
Robber did try to kill with a knife. But the victim ran away or avoided it. Then what kind of punishment does the robber get, and the victim is no longer the victim?
I think you should see a specialist at the hospital as soon as possible. Don't ride the time machine.
Hey son. What are you saying now? [about a month]? Did you read it correctly?
Civil case? Criminal case? None of my writing was based on a civil case! I only mentioned criminal offenses.
A conspiracy theory? You know you have a problem yourself, and you’re talking about a conspiracy theory? Does that make sense logically?
What a strange logic you're making. Does flattery create psychosis? Then do people around you develop psychosis if they receive excessive praise? I’d understand if it made me arrogant!
Your sentence is long, but if I were to sum up what you said, it would be this. You want to claim that I have a mental health problem, don't you?
You're right. It exploits psychological vulnerability. https://lemmy.ca/post/70233154
I am a South Korean. In the past, Korea ruled by exploiting its psychological vulnerability to [fear] by the power man. It happened a long time ago, but its impact still remains. I think I may am having immunity.
I think what Koreans have truly learned is the spirit of resistance. In the past, during the dictatorship, we Koreans risked our lives to deliver the truth through our mouths and ears.
I analyzed the characteristics of the algorithms big tech uses to exploit users’ psychological vulnerabilities, and based on that, I even created detection vaccines and checklists. https://lemmy.ca/post/70083912
[Nobody will listen.] , I know it is not true. There are people who blame me, and there are people who make baseless assumptions and speculations. It’s not that they won’t listen, but They want to turn away.
And Thank you so much.
I also have the same suspicion, and that suspicion is the starting point for gathering related evidence. Judgment and the outcome are matters for the judge to decide, but from the standpoint of reasonable doubt, it seems certain.
What are you agreeing to? Why don’t distorted judgments come out of distorted values? Whether you block my account or not is your right, and that is an undeniable fact. However, I would like to say that judgment is not something to be taken lightly.
Your judgment was wrong. I connect without logging in Google Gemini, and in Korea, the deceptive act of prompting input—what people in Korea call jailbreaking—is simply impossible. You haven’t read the entire log I’ve made public either, have you. Judging like that seems to indicate a serious problem with your discernment.
https://drive.proton.me/urls/FDM69JPT7W#lDhR7H8ecp3G <- Full Text
Whether it was induced or not, please judge for yourself after reading the entire transcript I have made public. https://lemmy.ca/post/70177374 or https://drive.proton.me/urls/FDM69JPT7W#lDhR7H8ecp3G
https://lemmy.ca/post/70082709
How about looking at it from a political and economic perspective? If we set the condition that they destroy the world for political purposes, harm nearby residents, and justify it for economic gain, wouldn’t it be possible to infer the exponentially growing debt of tech companies and the political motives behind it?
It's okay if you don't prove your low-intelligence discernment on your own. If you don’t say anything, you’ll probably mistake it for something intermediate...