Here is the study (pdf).
...
- Purely battery-electric vehicles reduce CO₂ emissions by only 41 percent on average compared to combustion vehicles. Yet the European Commission counts them as 100 percent climate-neutral.
- The reason: EU regulation measures CO₂ emissions only through tailpipe exhaust. Fossil carbon released during a vehicle’s production and through the electricity used to operate it, or not recovered during recycling, is not captured by EU Regulation 2019/631.
- This scientifically indefensible stance by the EU will cause the passenger car sector’s 2030 target of reducing CO₂ emissions by 188 million tons to be missed by more than 100 million tons. Combustion vehicles are expected to still make up 78 percent of the vehicle fleet in 2030.
...
If a manufacturer invests in near-CO₂-free steel, a supplier decarbonizes battery production, or a recycling company keeps critical raw materials in the loop, none of that improves the regulation’s metric under the EU’s current rules by a single gram. Regulation that does not capture relevant contributions to decarbonization cannot reward them either. And what it does not reward, industry will not finance at scale.
“The greatest economic and environmental misdirection lies in the fact that the European Commission’s regulation is based exclusively on CO₂ emissions from tailpipe exhaust,” says Prof. Johannes Fottner. “Under this logic, purely battery-electric vehicles are considered climate-neutral. The industry’s diverse efforts to reach climate targets – through green steel or circular economy practices, for instance – go unrewarded as a result.” Europe, he adds, can no longer afford to overlook this emissions reality.
...
The researchers therefore propose a life-cycle-based standard for defossilization.
...
As one report says, the EU rewards China’s coal power as Europe’s climate rules could end up favoring electric cars from China that are produced with high emissions.
...
6 Comments
dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 1d
Well that's what you get for killing the supply chain transparency laws, automotive lobby.
tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org · 1 pts · 1d
I agree, but it was also China which opposed this law ...
dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 1d
Well yeah, obviously, but why give up on the one selling point they could lean on as EU auto producers? "Certified Green Steel and slave labor free" unless, that would be a false claim...
tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org · 1 pts · 1d
German carmaker Volkswagen ceased its joint venture in China's Xinjiang region (which it had together with China's SAIC) as it is practically impossible to operate responsibly in China due to a lack of transparency. Chinese government is committing crimes against humanity, and subjecting Uyghurs and other minorities to state-imposed forced labor.
Chinese carmakers are all still operating under these conditions, which is why the government in Beijing opposed the supply chain law.
dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 1d
Yeah, exactly. So if the European carmakers had any sense, they'd have leveraged the supply chain transparency laws into a unique selling point instead of lobbying against them. Instead we have no guarantees EU cars do not heavily rely on parts coming from China anyway.
Eternal192@anarchist.nexus · 1 pts · 1d
Shows how much they knew about vehicle production while trying to force people to switch as fast as possible to EVs.
We could have had hydrogen powered cars ages ago but production and storage don't make it worthwhile for any company that wants to turn a profit.
EV production (battery and vehicle) needs to make drastic changes to keep it's carbon footprint claims.
Been considering getting an EV for about 2 years but haven't because i'm looking for something reliable and won't break the bank, but it's gotten a bit difficult to throw money around in Europe...