Can we just vote these Tory bastards out already?

87 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world

8 Comments

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 8 pts · 2y

The worst thing is that Starmer will inevitably adopt this as a “common sense” proposal to avoid being wedged/looking like some kind of Corbynite leftist.

feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y (6 replies)

In healthcare it's perfectly reasonable to use sex-specific language. There's sex-specific care, after all.

hellfire103@sopuli.xyz · 17 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Yes, but sex and gender are different things. Our government is planning to ban transgender women from female wards, for example.

dingus@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I'm about to ask an incredibly stupid question here but...what are female wards? Are, say, hospital floors divided by gender in your country? I am unfamiliar with doing that as a concept. I suppose the only sex/gender specific area of a hospital I know of is the labor and delivery department but it's because it involves people with a uterus delivering a baby.

feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)

OB/GYN, maternity ward.

dingus@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2y

I already mentioned that. You wouldn't see anyone banning people from those wards. It's literally just for people with a uterus, no matter the gender. So it doesn't make sense to say transgender women would be banned from the maternity ward. If a person is having a baby then they are having a baby. I am trying to understand the comment that I replied to.

Makiterr@iusearchlinux.fyi · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I'm only aware of care for specific bodily functions or behavior, none that is actually tied to sex.

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 2y

This is a pretty smoothbrained take