Man named in Supreme Court’s Colorado gay rights ruling says he didn’t request a wedding website

143 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world

12 Comments

Physnrd@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 3y (1 reply)

Direct link to AP news. Same article, no paywall

The guy isn't even gay and is married. This shit better get repealed.

Non paywall link.

This certainly feels on brand.

We really need to get these supreme court stooges out of there yesterday

The article is paywalled.

sadreality@kbin.social · 3 pts · 3y (3 replies)

[ removed ]

Animoscity@kbin.social · 2 pts · 3y (1 reply)

If you took a second to read any of the articles linked here the person in question didn’t know until a reporter reached out to them this week.

[ removed ]

Because no one thought that anyone would actually file a made up case to the Supreme Court..

kitonthenet@kbin.social · 3 pts · 3y (1 reply)

huh... just a fully fake case? none of the things that the case is about happened?

Yep. Not one thing in the filing actually happened. The Supreme court should never have heard the case.

Shoot there’s a paywall what does the article say?

I think Lorrie Smith’s (lack of) reputable credibility precludes any thinking person hiring her services.