This was so awkward I had to check if you were joking but nope, actual conservative who got his feelings hurt and retaliated with the two most generic right-wing insults there are.
Sorry, rosanne. I didnât know you were on lemmy. I still donât like some of the shit you say. You did an ok job on that one sitcom you had. I forgot the name of it. Not very funny though. Cool to meet you online though!
true I did select the best current Roseanne picture I could find, but as for the Madonna picture, that is the best current photo that exists of her, simply what she looks like now.
her instagram is pretty recent stuff and you can see the similarity to the photo you used but more flattering I think. https://www.instagram.com/madonna/
yeah but again they did not use the equivalent with the roseane picture. my comment (the first one, way at the start of the chain) was not about what was best but just at the disparity between the two types of pictures
Mostly due to the boxing. Had several facial injuries, had to have reconstructive surgery on his nose and cheekbone which didnât work, and had to teturn to surgery several times.
He says it was due to boxing injuries, but that sounds like a lie he made up for his horribly excessive plastic surgery. Mike Tyson got hit a thousand times harder than Rourke ever did, and he doesn't look like a blowup doll. Neither do any other famous professional boxers. Plastic surgery to repair damage doesn't include jumbo XXX sized lip injections.
Madonna spent years as a sex symbol, which absolutely takes time, effort and very consenious eating. Not to mention makeup, hair and fashion. What I see in her pic is a streamlined and simple to maintain look. She already has the money and nothing left to prove so... YOLO?
Because she had the audacity to * gasp * age. When you're a person who has been valued by the entire world for how your face looks, it's going to be fucking shattering when normal aging things start happening and people post pictures of you online with headlines and comments and articles about you've "let yourself go."
There is no winning. We demand that these women "age gracefully" which means, get no plastic surgery, but also stay hot like you were when you were 20, until you die, plz.
Are we purchase shaming people here now for buying a cheap fucking domain on Cloudflare? You are so tediously petty, it amazes me people care to tolerate this.
Also cf is about the only way to make federation affordable and safe. If we didnât use cf on programming.dev, the server charges per month would bankrupt me. Iâm not getting nearly enough donations to cover the bandwidth costs for every single call, cf covers like 70% of the bandwidth for free just due to caching. And cf also allows you to block and report child porn, thus taking another burden off server administrators.
People that think you shouldnât use cf just do not understand what it takes to run an instance.
And cf also allows you to block and report child porn
Thatâs been tried. When someone reported CP to Cloudflare, CF demanded the identity of the whiste blower then doxxed them to the offending CF user, who then published the whistle blowerâs identity so their users could retaliate. When the CEO (Matthew Prince) was confronted about this, his reply was that the whistle blowers âshould have used fake namesâ. Then this company you support had the nerve to claim to have a privacy pledge: â[A]ny personal information you provide to us is just that: personal and private.â
Also cf is about the only way to make federation affordable and safe. (emphasis mine)
Forcing children to reveal their residential IP addresses to the fedi whereby any interested person (read: child preditors) can derive their approximate location -- do you really think thatâs a good idea for safety?
What are you even thinking? It most certainly is not safe to expose 20%+ of everyoneâs traffic to a single corporation.
⌠nobody reports cp to cf. cf has a literal csam scanner that pretty much ever fediverse site is using. I own programming.dev. Itâs in use there. You clearly have no clue what youâre talking about. Have a nice day, Iâm really not in the mood to talk with you anymore.
You were given plenty of references. You can verify it yourself if you want to get a clue -- or continue to spread misinfo to the contrary. You are disservicing your users and the fedi by maintaining patronage to the privacy-abusing corp.
If you truly donât understand the problems with Cloudflare, why not embrace transparency and inform people who visit your site that CF is used and that CF sees all their traffic despite the padlock? If you are proud of this, why conceal it?
âPettyâ for not supporting the elitist exclusivity that you support? Cloudflare blocks impoverished communities whose ISPs use CGNAT because they cannot afford an IPv4 for everyone. Shame on CF pushers and shame on you for supporting marginalization by giant corps while backing privacy abuse.
Thatâs not true. Cloudflare marginalizes both normal users and street-wise users. In particular:
users whose ISP uses CGNAT to distribute a limited range of IPv4 addresses (this generally impacts poor people in impoverished regions)
the Tor community
VPN users
users of public libraries, and generally networks where IP addresses are shared
privacy enthusiasts who will not disclose ~25% of their web traffic to one single corporation in a country without privacy safeguards
blind people who disable images in their browsers (which triggers false positives for robots, as scripts are generally not interested in images either)
the permacomputing community and people on limited internet connections, who also disable browser images to reduce bandwidth which makes them appear as bots
people who actually run bots â Cloudflare is outspokenly anti-robot and treats beneficial bots the same as malicious bots
âŚ
There are likely more oppressed groups beyond that because there is no transparency with Cloudflare.
Not exactly. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world was a poor choice, as is:
!showerthoughts@zerobytes.monster â Cloudflare
!showerthoughts@sh.itjust.works â Cloudflare
!showerthoughts@lemmy.ca â Cloudflare
!showerthoughts@lemm.ee â Cloudflare
!hotshowerthoughts@x69.org â Cloudflare, and possibly irrelevant
!showerthoughts@lemmy.ml â not CF, but copious political baggage, abusive moderation & centralized by disproportionate size
Theyâre all shit & the OPâs own account is limited to creating a new community on #lemmyWorld. !showerthoughts@lemmy.ml would be the lesser of evils but the best move would be create an acct on a digital rights-respecting instance that allows community creations and then create showerthoughts community there.
(EDIT) !showerThoughts@fedia.io should address these issues.
Itâs an abuse of the fediverse and antithetical to #decentralization to use Cloudflare. And ironically your comment comes in response to broken functionality manifesting from links to exclusive venues appearing in an openly public forum.
76 Comments
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 219 pts · 2y
Yeah it's like all her ugliness moved to the inside
firkin_slang_whanger@lemmy.world · -25 pts · 2y
If I had a reddit award, I'd give it to you.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 159 pts · 2y
Sir, this is a Lemmy's.
firkin_slang_whanger@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 2y
đł Excuse me......If I had a Lemmy's award, I'd give it to them.
Kata1yst@kbin.social · 21 pts · 2y
Just chip a couple bucks to your local instance owner! Basically the same thing, without the glitz.
subignition@kbin.social · 14 pts · 2y
Toss a coin, to your admins...
dannym@lemmy.escapebigtech.info · 2 pts · 2y
Jilanico@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
The moment there's a financial incentive to post/comment, Lemmy will be flooded by bots using AI to make witty quips.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2y
Thanks for the mold, kind deranger
Kbobabob@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
dipshit@lemmy.world · 94 pts · 2y
until she speaks
ByteWizard@lemm.ee · -38 pts · 2y
You sound triggered. Touch grass once in a while and the truth won't be so upsetting.
PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee · 20 pts · 2y
This was so awkward I had to check if you were joking but nope, actual conservative who got his feelings hurt and retaliated with the two most generic right-wing insults there are.
I could teach your entire personality to a bird.
swayevenly@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 2y
That's insulting to the bird. Try a goldfish. At least they'd forget it sooner.
dipshit@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 2y
Sorry, rosanne. I didnât know you were on lemmy. I still donât like some of the shit you say. You did an ok job on that one sitcom you had. I forgot the name of it. Not very funny though. Cool to meet you online though!
Uh oh, I think I triggered rosanne.
Teon@kbin.social · 70 pts · 2y
But they are both bat shit crazy, so looks mean nothing at this point of de-evolution.
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
Have you heard of the crazy hot graph?
wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works · 27 pts · 2y
Crazy right wing is never hot tho. Boner killer for sure.
Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
I don't know, that Boebert broad got a nice fucking pair on her.
wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2y
wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 2y
Until you hear her talk, maybe.
ikidd@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 2y
Face it, you'd throw a hate fuck into Bohbert. You know it.
cheesemoo@lemmy.conk.me · 2 pts · 2y
đ¤˘đ¤Ž
NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social · 4 pts · 2y
Ah the Vicky Mendez parallel
kameecoding@lemmy.world · 43 pts · 2y
I just feel bad for madonna, that's a mental health issue and just sad stuff all around.
NounsAndWords@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 2y
I would say the same for both.
KingJalopy@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 2y
Should feel bad for Roseanne then as well
phillaholic@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
Why? She had so many chances at just not saying really shitty things and ended up getting a huge pay out to not work anymore.
HubertManne@kbin.social · 36 pts · 2y
speak for youself and the current pictures you are using I would say is about the most flattering of the one and unflattering of the other.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y
true I did select the best current Roseanne picture I could find, but as for the Madonna picture, that is the best current photo that exists of her, simply what she looks like now.
HubertManne@kbin.social · 7 pts · 2y
her instagram is pretty recent stuff and you can see the similarity to the photo you used but more flattering I think. https://www.instagram.com/madonna/
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2y
Whoa her self-curated photos are much more flattering than the candid shots the media keeps capturing đ¤
HubertManne@kbin.social · 13 pts · 2y
yes. thus my flattering vs unflattering comment. its a best of this person vs worst of this person. paparazzi are known for getting the most unflatering thing they can get. here is an unflattering of rosanne https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.9sycqP26-qlbyK5E4UMPyQHaE_%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=080cdf0e155de1bfe8e4ac255684a560d210d80d146ed58a7c76900237c9b690&ipo=images
Anticorp@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
She still looks better than Madonna, which I never thought I'd say.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 2y
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 2y
HubertManne@kbin.social · 1 pts · 2y
yeah but again they did not use the equivalent with the roseane picture. my comment (the first one, way at the start of the chain) was not about what was best but just at the disparity between the two types of pictures
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 2y
AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 2y
She's essentially a professional model, of course posed studio shots look better than whatever random shit a paparazzi snaps.
AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
But it's Instagram. Everyone's more flattering there.
HubertManne@kbin.social · 3 pts · 2y
yes. thus my flattering vs unflattering comment. its a best of this person vs worst of this person. paparazzi are known for getting the most unflatering thing they can get. here is an unflattering of rosanne https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.9sycqP26-qlbyK5E4UMPyQHaE_%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=080cdf0e155de1bfe8e4ac255684a560d210d80d146ed58a7c76900237c9b690&ipo=images
Anticorp@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Those have a shit ton of filters and special lighting on them.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net · 33 pts · 2y
Madonna looks like a giant cockroach wearing Madonna like a suit.
Tathas@programming.dev · 27 pts · 2y
Can I have... some sugar... water?
FeetinMashedPotatoes@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
MOAR
Iliveonsaturdays@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 2y
It's 2023/2024 and Steve Buscemi is now more attractive than Mickey Rourke
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 2y
for fun I wanted to upload comparison photos of Mickey Rourke and Steve, but Steve Buscemi photos not needed; we all know what he looks like.
AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y
I've never heard a good explanation of wtf happened to Mickey Rourke.
There's no gray area. It's like he woke up one day and had become a troll.
GombeenSysadmin@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 2y
Mostly due to the boxing. Had several facial injuries, had to have reconstructive surgery on his nose and cheekbone which didnât work, and had to teturn to surgery several times.
Anticorp@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
He says it was due to boxing injuries, but that sounds like a lie he made up for his horribly excessive plastic surgery. Mike Tyson got hit a thousand times harder than Rourke ever did, and he doesn't look like a blowup doll. Neither do any other famous professional boxers. Plastic surgery to repair damage doesn't include jumbo XXX sized lip injections.
AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Wow he used to look a lot like Bruce Willis
mysoulishome@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
Bruce Willis/Don Johnson
glorious_albus@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 2y
Always has been.
z00s@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2y
"Everything everywhere all at once" is the title of a movie, not something you should tell your plastic surgeon.
Smeagol666@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
I just watched that movie three days ago, had to get some everything bagels to celebrate.
Illecors@lemmy.cafe · 11 pts · 2y
Imgur does not load on VPN connections
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
okay I think I fixed it up there.
Illecors@lemmy.cafe · 6 pts · 2y
Thank you!
Pratai@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 2y
FoundTheVegan@kbin.social · 7 pts · 2y
Madonna spent years as a sex symbol, which absolutely takes time, effort and very consenious eating. Not to mention makeup, hair and fashion. What I see in her pic is a streamlined and simple to maintain look. She already has the money and nothing left to prove so... YOLO?
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 12 pts · 2y
Then why destroy her face with terrible plastic surgery
I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 2y
Because she had the audacity to * gasp * age. When you're a person who has been valued by the entire world for how your face looks, it's going to be fucking shattering when normal aging things start happening and people post pictures of you online with headlines and comments and articles about you've "let yourself go."
There is no winning. We demand that these women "age gracefully" which means, get no plastic surgery, but also stay hot like you were when you were 20, until you die, plz.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 2y
Consensual?
Conscious?
Conscientious?
Contentious?
Igloojoe@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 2y
Thats not relaxing on beauty. That's trying harder than ever and using plastic surgery / botox.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de · 6 pts · 2y
No, I'm not googling that.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2y
nbafantest@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Good on her for taking better care of herself. It is not easy, especially when you started from the left picture.
snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
This is like saying dirt looks better than mud.
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
sagrotan@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 2y
Was there a time when Madonna was attractive? Witnessed her whole career, involuntary, but missed that moment apparently.
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · -50 pts · 2y
#digitalExclusion
Shame this is posted on a centralized Cloudflare instance, which causes problems for people using Tor,VPNs,CGNAT,etc:
BaroqueInMind@kbin.social · 19 pts · 2y
Are we purchase shaming people here now for buying a cheap fucking domain on Cloudflare? You are so tediously petty, it amazes me people care to tolerate this.
snowe@programming.dev · 11 pts · 2y
Also cf is about the only way to make federation affordable and safe. If we didnât use cf on programming.dev, the server charges per month would bankrupt me. Iâm not getting nearly enough donations to cover the bandwidth costs for every single call, cf covers like 70% of the bandwidth for free just due to caching. And cf also allows you to block and report child porn, thus taking another burden off server administrators.
People that think you shouldnât use cf just do not understand what it takes to run an instance.
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · 1 pts · 2y
Thatâs been tried. When someone reported CP to Cloudflare, CF demanded the identity of the whiste blower then doxxed them to the offending CF user, who then published the whistle blowerâs identity so their users could retaliate. When the CEO (Matthew Prince) was confronted about this, his reply was that the whistle blowers âshould have used fake namesâ. Then this company you support had the nerve to claim to have a privacy pledge: â[A]ny personal information you provide to us is just that: personal and private.â
Forcing children to reveal their residential IP addresses to the fedi whereby any interested person (read: child preditors) can derive their approximate location -- do you really think thatâs a good idea for safety?
What are you even thinking? It most certainly is not safe to expose 20%+ of everyoneâs traffic to a single corporation.
snowe@programming.dev · 1 pts · 2y
⌠nobody reports cp to cf. cf has a literal csam scanner that pretty much ever fediverse site is using. I own programming.dev. Itâs in use there. You clearly have no clue what youâre talking about. Have a nice day, Iâm really not in the mood to talk with you anymore.
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · -1 pts · 2y
You were given plenty of references. You can verify it yourself if you want to get a clue -- or continue to spread misinfo to the contrary. You are disservicing your users and the fedi by maintaining patronage to the privacy-abusing corp.
If you truly donât understand the problems with Cloudflare, why not embrace transparency and inform people who visit your site that CF is used and that CF sees all their traffic despite the padlock? If you are proud of this, why conceal it?
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · -2 pts · 2y
âPettyâ for not supporting the elitist exclusivity that you support? Cloudflare blocks impoverished communities whose ISPs use CGNAT because they cannot afford an IPv4 for everyone. Shame on CF pushers and shame on you for supporting marginalization by giant corps while backing privacy abuse.
Chozo@kbin.social · 5 pts · 2y
I think whatever you're doing is a little overkill for Lemmy. Normal users don't have these issues.
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · 4 pts · 2y
Thatâs not true. Cloudflare marginalizes both normal users and street-wise users. In particular:
There are likely more oppressed groups beyond that because there is no transparency with Cloudflare.
BaroqueInMind@kbin.social · 3 pts · 2y
Good thing that they can just simply use another fucking instance thanks to federated systems.
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · -1 pts · 2y
Not exactly.
!showerthoughts@lemmy.worldwas a poor choice, as is:!showerthoughts@zerobytes.monsterâ Cloudflare!showerthoughts@sh.itjust.worksâ Cloudflare!showerthoughts@lemmy.caâ Cloudflare!showerthoughts@lemm.eeâ Cloudflare!hotshowerthoughts@x69.orgâ Cloudflare, and possibly irrelevant!showerthoughts@lemmy.mlâ not CF, but copious political baggage, abusive moderation & centralized by disproportionate sizeTheyâre all shit & the OPâs own account is limited to creating a new community on #lemmyWorld.
!showerthoughts@lemmy.mlwould be the lesser of evils but the best move would be create an acct on a digital rights-respecting instance that allows community creations and then create showerthoughts community there.(EDIT)
!showerThoughts@fedia.ioshould address these issues.breakingcups@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
It's the beauty of the fediverse
ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io · 0 pts · 2y
Itâs an abuse of the fediverse and antithetical to #decentralization to use Cloudflare. And ironically your comment comes in response to broken functionality manifesting from links to exclusive venues appearing in an openly public forum.